301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33835637)
1. Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals and predicting cognitive functions via autoencoder.
Cai B; Zhang G; Zhang A; Xiao L; Hu W; Stephen JM; Wilson TW; Calhoun VD; Wang YP
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Jun; 42(9):2691-2705. PubMed ID: 33835637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brain fingerprinting and cognitive behavior predicting using functional connectome of high inter-subject variability.
Lu J; Yan T; Yang L; Zhang X; Li J; Li D; Xiang J; Wang B
Neuroimage; 2024 Jul; 295():120651. PubMed ID: 38788914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Refined measure of functional connectomes for improved identifiability and prediction.
Cai B; Zhang G; Hu W; Zhang A; Zille P; Zhang Y; Stephen JM; Wilson TW; Calhoun VD; Wang YP
Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Nov; 40(16):4843-4858. PubMed ID: 31355994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chronnectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals and predicting higher cognitive functions using dynamic brain connectivity patterns.
Liu J; Liao X; Xia M; He Y
Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Feb; 39(2):902-915. PubMed ID: 29143409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring MEG brain fingerprints: Evaluation, pitfalls, and interpretations.
Sareen E; Zahar S; Ville DV; Gupta A; Griffa A; Amico E
Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118331. PubMed ID: 34237444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of inter-individual variability on the estimation of default mode network in temporal concatenation group ICA.
Hu Y; Yang Z
Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118114. PubMed ID: 33933594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-resolution connectomic fingerprints: Mapping neural identity and behavior.
Mansour L S; Tian Y; Yeo BTT; Cropley V; Zalesky A
Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 229():117695. PubMed ID: 33422711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity.
Finn ES; Shen X; Scheinost D; Rosenberg MD; Huang J; Chun MM; Papademetris X; Constable RT
Nat Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 18(11):1664-71. PubMed ID: 26457551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional connectome fingerprinting accuracy in youths and adults is similar when examined on the same day and 1.5-years apart.
Jalbrzikowski M; Liu F; Foran W; Klei L; Calabro FJ; Roeder K; Devlin B; Luna B
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Oct; 41(15):4187-4199. PubMed ID: 32652852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual-specific fMRI-Subspaces improve functional connectivity prediction of behavior.
Kashyap R; Kong R; Bhattacharjee S; Li J; Zhou J; Thomas Yeo BT
Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():804-812. PubMed ID: 30711467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Longitudinal stability of the brain functional connectome is associated with episodic memory performance in aging.
Ousdal OT; Kaufmann T; Kolskår K; Vik A; Wehling E; Lundervold AJ; Lundervold A; Westlye LT
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Feb; 41(3):697-709. PubMed ID: 31652017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uncovering multi-site identifiability based on resting-state functional connectomes.
Bari S; Amico E; Vike N; Talavage TM; Goñi J
Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():115967. PubMed ID: 31352124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Network-level macroscale structural connectivity predicts propagation of transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Momi D; Ozdemir RA; Tadayon E; Boucher P; Shafi MM; Pascual-Leone A; Santarnecchi E
Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 229():117698. PubMed ID: 33385561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional connectomes incorporating phase synchronization for the characterization and prediction of individual differences.
Cai B; Zhou Z; Zhang A; Zhang G; Xiao L; Stephen JM; Wilson TW; Calhoun VD; Wang YP
J Neurosci Methods; 2022 Apr; 372():109539. PubMed ID: 35219769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying inter-individual differences in pain threshold using brain connectome: a test-retest reproducible study.
Tu Y; Zhang B; Cao J; Wilson G; Zhang Z; Kong J
Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116049. PubMed ID: 31349067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissociating individual connectome traits using low-rank learning.
Qin J; Shen H; Zeng LL; Gao K; Luo Z; Hu D
Brain Res; 2019 Nov; 1722():146348. PubMed ID: 31348912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unique Mapping of Structural and Functional Connectivity on Cognition.
Zimmermann J; Griffiths JD; McIntosh AR
J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(45):9658-9667. PubMed ID: 30249801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical connectome fingerprints of cognitive decline.
Sorrentino P; Rucco R; Lardone A; Liparoti M; Troisi Lopez E; Cavaliere C; Soricelli A; Jirsa V; Sorrentino G; Amico E
Neuroimage; 2021 Sep; 238():118253. PubMed ID: 34116156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing differential identifiability improves connectome predictive modeling of cognitive deficits from functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease.
Svaldi DO; Goñi J; Abbas K; Amico E; Clark DG; Muralidharan C; Dzemidzic M; West JD; Risacher SL; Saykin AJ; Apostolova LG
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Aug; 42(11):3500-3516. PubMed ID: 33949732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Brain parcellation driven by dynamic functional connectivity better capture intrinsic network dynamics.
Fan L; Zhong Q; Qin J; Li N; Su J; Zeng LL; Hu D; Shen H
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Apr; 42(5):1416-1433. PubMed ID: 33283954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
