205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33836393)
1. Origins of major and minor ash constituents of solid recovered fuel for co-processing in the cement industry.
Viczek SA; Aldrian A; Pomberger R; Sarc R
Waste Manag; 2021 May; 126():423-432. PubMed ID: 33836393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of MRF residue as alternative fuel in cement production.
Fyffe JR; Breckel AC; Townsend AK; Webber ME
Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):276-84. PubMed ID: 26187294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Co-processing of solid recovered fuels from mixed municipal and commercial waste in the cement industry - A pathway to a circular economy.
Sarc R; Viczek SA
Waste Manag Res; 2024 Mar; 42(3):260-272. PubMed ID: 37382414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process. Part 1: SRF produced from commercial and industrial waste.
Nasrullah M; Vainikka P; Hannula J; Hurme M; Kärki J
Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1398-407. PubMed ID: 24735992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recycling potential of post-consumer plastic packaging waste in Finland.
Dahlbo H; Poliakova V; Mylläri V; Sahimaa O; Anderson R
Waste Manag; 2018 Jan; 71():52-61. PubMed ID: 29097129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for identifying the material-recyclable share of SRF during co-processing in the cement industry.
Aldrian A; Viczek SA; Pomberger R; Sarc R
MethodsX; 2020; 7():100837. PubMed ID: 32195149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The strategy for conservation non-renewable natural resources through producing and application solid recovery fuel in the cement industry: a case study for Lithuania.
Pitak I; Rinkevičius D; Kalpokaitė-Dičkuvienė R; Baltušnikas A; Denafas G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(46):69618-69634. PubMed ID: 35576030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gravity packaging final waste recovery based on gravity separation and chemical imaging control.
Bonifazi G; Serranti S; Potenza F; Luciani V; Di Maio F
Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():50-55. PubMed ID: 27353391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The application of SRF vs. RDF classification and specifications to the material flows of two mechanical-biological treatment plants of Rome: Comparison and implications.
Di Lonardo MC; Franzese M; Costa G; Gavasci R; Lombardi F
Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):195-205. PubMed ID: 26243051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process. Part 2: SRF produced from construction and demolition waste.
Nasrullah M; Vainikka P; Hannula J; Hurme M; Kärki J
Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2163-70. PubMed ID: 25074716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Solid residues from Italian municipal solid waste incinerators: A source for "critical" raw materials.
Funari V; Braga R; Bokhari SN; Dinelli E; Meisel T
Waste Manag; 2015 Nov; 45():206-16. PubMed ID: 25512234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wide-scale utilization of MSWI fly ashes in cement production and its impact on average heavy metal contents in cements: The case of Austria.
Lederer J; Trinkel V; Fellner J
Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():247-258. PubMed ID: 27815031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of coal/solid recovered fuel (SRF) with coal/refuse derived fuel (RDF) in a fluidized bed reactor.
Wagland ST; Kilgallon P; Coveney R; Garg A; Smith R; Longhurst PJ; Pollard SJ; Simms N
Waste Manag; 2011 Jun; 31(6):1176-83. PubMed ID: 21288710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives in solid recovered fuel production in Bolivia: Analysis of characteristics and potential benefits.
Ferronato N; Calle Mendoza IJ; Marconi Siñani NG; Gorritty Portillo MA; Torretta V
Waste Manag; 2022 May; 144():324-335. PubMed ID: 35429870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Energy implications of mechanical and mechanical-biological treatment compared to direct waste-to-energy.
Cimpan C; Wenzel H
Waste Manag; 2013 Jul; 33(7):1648-58. PubMed ID: 23660494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modelling of material recovery from waste incineration bottom ash.
Huber F
Waste Manag; 2020 Mar; 105():61-72. PubMed ID: 32028102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recovery of plastic packaging from mixed municipal solid waste. A case study from Austria.
Blasenbauer D; Lipp AM; Fellner J; Tischberger-Aldrian A; Stipanović H; Lederer J
Waste Manag; 2024 May; 180():9-22. PubMed ID: 38503033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterisation and composition identification of waste-derived fuels obtained from municipal solid waste using thermogravimetry: A review.
Gerassimidou S; Velis CA; Williams PT; Komilis D
Waste Manag Res; 2020 Sep; 38(9):942-965. PubMed ID: 32705957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Processing and properties of a solid energy fuel from municipal solid waste (MSW) and recycled plastics.
Gug J; Cacciola D; Sobkowicz MJ
Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():283-92. PubMed ID: 25453320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of calcium sulfo-aluminate cement as an alternative to Portland Cement for the recycling of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash in mortar.
Antoun M; Becquart F; Gerges N; Aouad G
Waste Manag Res; 2020 Aug; 38(8):868-875. PubMed ID: 32419672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
