These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33837104)

  • 1. Chinesisation, adaptation and validation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional observational study.
    Zhang Z; Wang G; Wu Y; Guo J; Ding N; Jiang B; Wei H; Li B; Yue W; Tian J
    BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e045550. PubMed ID: 33837104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity, inter-rater reliability, and feasibility of the Chelsea Physical Assessment Tool for assessing physical function in post-acute COVID-19 patients: A cross-sectional study.
    Giray E; Turan Z; Öke D; Topaloğlu M; Baygul A; Curci C; de Sire A; Taskiran OO
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2023; 36(3):527-539. PubMed ID: 36617777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. German version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx-GE): translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability.
    Eggmann S; Verra ML; Stefanicki V; Kindler A; Seyler D; Hilfiker R; Schefold JC; Bastiaenen CHG; Zante B
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 44(16):4509-4518. PubMed ID: 33874842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Construct validity of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool: an observational study of recovery from critical illness.
    Corner EJ; Soni N; Handy JM; Brett SJ
    Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 18(2):R55. PubMed ID: 24669784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Norwegian Version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx-NOR): Translation, Face Validity, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Inter-Rater Reliability.
    Schanke CM; Brekka AK; Rimehaug SA; Klokkerud M; Andersen TM
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jul; 12(15):. PubMed ID: 37568435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-cultural adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the Swedish version of the Chelsea critical care assessment tool (CPAX-Swe) in critically ill patients.
    Holdar U; Eriksson F; Siesage K; Corner EJ; Ledström V; Svensson-Raskh A; Kierkegaard M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2021 Jun; 43(11):1600-1604. PubMed ID: 31558043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive validity of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults: a prospective clinimetric study.
    Eggmann S; Verra ML; Stefanicki V; Kindler A; Schefold JC; Zante B; Bastiaenen CHG
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jan; 45(1):111-116. PubMed ID: 34994664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnostic tools of intensive care unit acquired weakness: a systematic review].
    Wu Y; Ding N; Jiang B; Zhang Z; Zhang C; Li B
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1154-1160. PubMed ID: 30592950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx): validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; an observational proof-of-concept pilot study.
    Corner EJ; Wood H; Englebretsen C; Thomas A; Grant RL; Nikoletou D; Soni N
    Physiotherapy; 2013 Mar; 99(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 23219649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool into Danish.
    Astrup K; Corner EJ; Hansen MG; Petersen AK
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2020 Sep; 36(9):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 30499357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The responsiveness of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool in measuring functional recovery in the burns critical care population: an observational study.
    Corner EJ; Hichens LV; Attrill KM; Vizcaychipi MP; Brett SJ; Handy JM
    Burns; 2015 Mar; 41(2):241-7. PubMed ID: 25554262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and responsiveness of the Danish version of The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx).
    Astrup K; Corner E; Van Tulder M; Sørensen L
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2023 Jan; 39(1):193-199. PubMed ID: 34784835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment (CPAx) tool on clinical outcomes of surgical and trauma patients in an intensive care unit: An experimental study.
    Whelan M; van Aswegen H; Corner E
    S Afr J Physiother; 2018; 74(1):450. PubMed ID: 30214949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. eLearning to facilitate the education and implementation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment: a novel measure of function in critical illness.
    Corner EJ; Handy JM; Brett SJ
    BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e010614. PubMed ID: 27067895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical value of early bedside ultrasound measurement of quadriceps femoris in diagnosis of ICU-acquired weakness].
    Li RY; He HW; Sun JH; Li Q; Long Y; Liu HP
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jul; 100(25):1967-1972. PubMed ID: 32629598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Current practice and obstacle factors of intensive care unit-acquired weakness assessment].
    Wu Y; Jiang B; Wang G; Wei H; Li B; Shen X; Zhang C; Zhang Z
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2020 Sep; 32(9):1111-1117. PubMed ID: 33081900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a Chinese version critical-care pain observation tool in nonintubated and intubated critically ill patients: Two cross-sectional studies.
    Chen J; Hu F; Yang J; Wu XY; Feng Y; Zhan YC; An YZ; Lu Q; Zhang HY
    J Clin Nurs; 2019 Aug; 28(15-16):2824-2832. PubMed ID: 30938890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical function and activity of patients after open abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing the clinimetric properties of two outcome measures.
    Fourie M; van Aswegen H
    Physiotherapy; 2024 Jun; 123():142-150. PubMed ID: 38490073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the behavioral pain scale in intubated and non-intubated critically ill patients: Two cross-sectional studies.
    Chen J; Lu Q; Wu XY; An YZ; Zhan YC; Zhang HY
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2016 Sep; 61():63-71. PubMed ID: 27289036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical predictive value of manual muscle strength testing during critical illness: an observational cohort study.
    Connolly BA; Jones GD; Curtis AA; Murphy PB; Douiri A; Hopkinson NS; Polkey MI; Moxham J; Hart N
    Crit Care; 2013 Oct; 17(5):R229. PubMed ID: 24112540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.