These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33838739)

  • 1. Choice of outcome measures in mental health research.
    Boyce N; Graham D; Marsh J
    Lancet Psychiatry; 2021 Jun; 8(6):455. PubMed ID: 33838739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes for the Journal: Introduction of Four Subdomains.
    Lin SJ; Johnson AR; Chen AD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Jul; 142(1):281-285. PubMed ID: 29952909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why are we not measuring what matters in mental health in the UK? The case for routine use of recovery outcome measures.
    Newman-Taylor K; Maguire T; Bowen A
    Perspect Public Health; 2019 Jul; 139(4):181-183. PubMed ID: 31251132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The CROWN Initiative: Journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health.
    Khan K;
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 57():e1-e4. PubMed ID: 25134450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Getting the most from Indigenous health research.
    Thomas DP; Anderson IP
    Med J Aust; 2006 May; 184(10):500-1. PubMed ID: 16719747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection of a Child Clinical Outcome Measure for Statewide Use in Publicly Funded Outpatient Mental Health Programs.
    Zima BT; Marti FA; Lee CE; Pourat N
    Psychiatr Serv; 2019 May; 70(5):381-388. PubMed ID: 30813864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in community mental health service users in Japan.
    Kotake R; Kanehara A; Miyamoto Y; Kumakura Y; Sawada U; Takano A; Chiba R; Ogawa M; Kondo S; Kasai K; Kawakami N
    BMC Psychiatry; 2020 Feb; 20(1):51. PubMed ID: 32028913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital phenotyping for assessment and prediction of mental health outcomes: a scoping review protocol.
    Spinazze P; Rykov Y; Bottle A; Car J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e032255. PubMed ID: 31892655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A critical interpretive synthesis of the most commonly used self-report measures in Australian mental health research.
    Bibb J; Baker FA; Skewes McFerran K
    Australas Psychiatry; 2016 Oct; 24(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 26819403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of mental health outcomes in veterans and servicemembers: A scoping review.
    Gromatsky M; Sullivan SR; Spears AP; Mitchell E; Walsh S; Kimbrel NA; Goodman M
    Psychiatry Res; 2020 Oct; 292():113359. PubMed ID: 32777594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of life and individual treatment choice in trigeminal neuralgia.
    Barker FG
    Pain; 2007 Oct; 131(3):234-236. PubMed ID: 17768008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes Part I: What Makes a Good Outcome Measure?
    Kovach CR
    Res Gerontol Nurs; 2019 Nov; 12(6):271-273. PubMed ID: 31755963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reanalysis of the physical and mental health summary scores of dialysis versus conservative care in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a critical appraisal.
    Verberne WR; Dijkers J; Kelder JC; Jellema WT; van Delden JJM; Bos WJW
    BMC Res Notes; 2019 Nov; 12(1):722. PubMed ID: 31685021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of cluster randomised trials with an assessment of outcome at baseline.
    Hooper R; Forbes A; Hemming K; Takeda A; Beresford L
    BMJ; 2018 Mar; 360():k1121. PubMed ID: 29559436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health to identify outcome domains for a core outcome set for aphasia: a comparison of stakeholder perspectives.
    Wallace SJ; Worrall L; Rose T; Le Dorze G
    Disabil Rehabil; 2019 Mar; 41(5):564-573. PubMed ID: 29130767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cut-points for the measurement of pain: the choice depends on what you want to study.
    Farrar JT
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):163-164. PubMed ID: 20347224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving reporting of ICU outcome data.
    Flaatten HK; Haney MF
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2020 Mar; 64(3):280-281. PubMed ID: 31764993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of health transition questions is supported by larger clinical improvements in purposive samples enriched for improvers.
    Ward MM; Guthrie LC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 116():138-139. PubMed ID: 31228533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Framework for Advancing Precision Medicine in Clinical Trials for Mental Disorders.
    Lenze EJ; Rodebaugh TL; Nicol GE
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2020 Jul; 77(7):663-664. PubMed ID: 32211837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Service user views and service user research in the Journal of mental health.
    Rose D
    J Ment Health; 2011 Oct; 20(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 21942681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.