174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33838937)
1. Principal component regression-based contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation system for the management of BI-RADS US 4A breast masses: objective assistance for radiologists.
Lin ZM; Chen JF; Xu FT; Liu CM; Chen JS; Wang Y; Zhang C; Huang PT
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1737-1746. PubMed ID: 33838937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography for management of BI-RADS category 4 nonpalpable breast masses.
Niu Q; Zhao L; Wang R; Du L; Shi Q; Jia C; Li G; Jin L; Li F
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 173():111391. PubMed ID: 38422608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of sub-centimetre breast lesions: combining BI-RADS-US with strain elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound-a preliminary study in China.
Xiao X; Jiang Q; Wu H; Guan X; Qin W; Luo B
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jun; 27(6):2443-2450. PubMed ID: 27761708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporating Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound into the BI-RADS Scoring System Improves Accuracy in Breast Tumor Diagnosis: A Preliminary Study in China.
Xiao X; Dong L; Jiang Q; Guan X; Wu H; Luo B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):2630-2638. PubMed ID: 27544439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant non-mass breast lesions and exploration of diagnostic criteria.
Zhang F; Jin L; Li G; Jia C; Shi Q; Du L; Wu R
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20200880. PubMed ID: 33560894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjunctive targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the work-up of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and 4 lesions.
Zhang XL; Guan J; Li MZ; Liu MJ; Guo Y; Zheng YL; Yang Z; Yang JY
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 27162117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of BI-RADS-US 4a lesions less than 2 cm in diameter.
Yu MQ; Zhang LL; Jiang LP; Zhou AY
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2023; 83(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 35599475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Prospective Study on the Value of Ultrasound Microflow Assessment to Distinguish Malignant from Benign Solid Breast Masses: Association between Ultrasound Parameters and Histologic Microvessel Densities.
Park AY; Kwon M; Woo OH; Cho KR; Park EK; Cha SH; Song SE; Lee JH; Cha J; Son GS; Seo BK
Korean J Radiol; 2019 May; 20(5):759-772. PubMed ID: 30993927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small breast lesions.
Du YR; Wu Y; Chen M; Gu XG
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast US-BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions with calcifications.
Cheng M; Tong W; Luo J; Li M; Liang J; Pan F; Pan J; Zheng Y; Xie X
Clin Radiol; 2020 Dec; 75(12):934-941. PubMed ID: 32814625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodal Ultrasound Imaging in Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 4 Breast Lesions: A Prediction Model for Malignancy.
Li XL; Lu F; Zhu AQ; Du D; Zhang YF; Guo LH; Sun LP; Xu HX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3188-3199. PubMed ID: 32896449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) play a better role in diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification? A comparison with MRI.
Pan J; Tong W; Luo J; Liang J; Pan F; Zheng Y; Xie X
Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200195. PubMed ID: 32463295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast lesions of BI-RADS 4].
Liang YC; Jia CM; Xue Y; Lü Q; Chen F; Wang JJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 May; 98(19):1498-1502. PubMed ID: 29804418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The clinical value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of BI-RADS 4 lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging.
Guo W; Li F; Jia C; Wang T; Zhang X; Yao G; Shi X; Bai M
Br J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 95(1136):20220025. PubMed ID: 35604699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The kinetic quantitative characteristics of non-mass breast lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a prospective study.
Cai YY; Du YC; Zhao L; Hu WJ; Bai Y; Chen A; Du LF; Li F
Br J Radiol; 2023 Dec; 96(1152):20221002. PubMed ID: 37660395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A combined ultrasonic B-mode and color Doppler system for the classification of breast masses using neural network.
Qian X; Zhang B; Liu S; Wang Y; Chen X; Liu J; Yang Y; Chen X; Wei Y; Xiao Q; Ma J; Shung KK; Zhou Q; Liu L; Chen Z
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):3023-3033. PubMed ID: 32006174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Downgrading of Breast Masses Suspicious for Cancer by Using Optoacoustic Breast Imaging.
Menezes GLG; Pijnappel RM; Meeuwis C; Bisschops R; Veltman J; Lavin PT; van de Vijver MJ; Mann RM
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):355-365. PubMed ID: 29664342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast BI-RADS 3-5 lesions.
Janu E; Krikavova L; Little J; Dvorak K; Brancikova D; Jandakova E; Pavlik T; Kovalcikova P; Kazda T; Valek V
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):66. PubMed ID: 32552678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
Neuschler EI; Butler R; Young CA; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Donlan P; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Lavin PT; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Schilling KJ; Tucker FL; Dogan BE
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of diagnostic efficacy of multimode ultrasound in BI-RADS 4 breast neoplasms and establishment of a predictive model.
Chen Y; Lu J; Li J; Liao J; Huang X; Zhang B
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1053280. PubMed ID: 36505867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
