These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33840132)

  • 1. Improving Ki67 assessment concordance by the use of an artificial intelligence-empowered microscope: a multi-institutional ring study.
    Cai L; Yan K; Bu H; Yue M; Dong P; Wang X; Li L; Tian K; Shen H; Zhang J; Shang J; Niu S; Han D; Ren C; Huang J; Han X; Yao J; Liu Y
    Histopathology; 2021 Oct; 79(4):544-555. PubMed ID: 33840132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can AI-assisted microscope facilitate breast HER2 interpretation? A multi-institutional ring study.
    Yue M; Zhang J; Wang X; Yan K; Cai L; Tian K; Niu S; Han X; Yu Y; Huang J; Han D; Yao J; Liu Y
    Virchows Arch; 2021 Sep; 479(3):443-449. PubMed ID: 34279719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial intelligence-assisted interpretation of Ki-67 expression and repeatability in breast cancer.
    Li L; Han D; Yu Y; Li J; Liu Y
    Diagn Pathol; 2022 Jan; 17(1):20. PubMed ID: 35094693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An interobserver reproducibility analysis of size-set semiautomatic counting for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer.
    Wang YX; Wang YY; Yang CG; Bu H; Yang WT; Wang L; Xu WM; Zhao XL; Zhao WX; Li L; Song SL; Yang JL
    Breast; 2020 Feb; 49():225-232. PubMed ID: 31911370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artificial intelligence enhances whole-slide interpretation of PD-L1 CPS in triple-negative breast cancer: A multi-institutional ring study.
    Li J; Dong P; Wang X; Zhang J; Zhao M; Shen H; Cai L; He J; Han M; Miao J; Liu H; Yang W; Han X; Liu Y
    Histopathology; 2024 Sep; 85(3):451-467. PubMed ID: 38747491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The human-in-the-loop: an evaluation of pathologists' interaction with artificial intelligence in clinical practice.
    Bodén ACS; Molin J; Garvin S; West RA; Lundström C; Treanor D
    Histopathology; 2021 Aug; 79(2):210-218. PubMed ID: 33590577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration.
    Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Zabaglo LA; Arun I; Badve SS; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Borgquist S; Chang MC; Dodson A; Ehinger A; Fineberg S; Focke CM; Gao D; Gown AM; Gutierrez C; Hugh JC; Kos Z; Laenkholm AV; Mastropasqua MG; Moriya T; Nofech-Mozes S; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Sakatani T; Salgado R; Starczynski J; Sugie T; van der Vegt B; Viale G; Hayes DF; McShane LM; Dowsett M;
    Histopathology; 2019 Aug; 75(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 31017314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver concordance of Ki67 labeling index in breast cancer: Japan Breast Cancer Research Group Ki67 ring study.
    Mikami Y; Ueno T; Yoshimura K; Tsuda H; Kurosumi M; Masuda S; Horii R; Toi M; Sasano H
    Cancer Sci; 2013 Nov; 104(11):1539-43. PubMed ID: 23905924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Application Test of the AI-Automatic Diagnostic System for Ki-67 in Breast Cancer].
    Deng Y; Li FL; Qin HY; Zhou YY; Zhou QQ; Mei J; Li L; Liu HH; Wang YZ; Bu H; Bao J
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Jul; 52(4):693-697. PubMed ID: 34323051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An international Ki67 reproducibility study.
    Polley MY; Leung SC; McShane LM; Gao D; Hugh JC; Mastropasqua MG; Viale G; Zabaglo LA; Penault-Llorca F; Bartlett JM; Gown AM; Symmans WF; Piper T; Mehl E; Enos RA; Hayes DF; Dowsett M; Nielsen TO;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Dec; 105(24):1897-906. PubMed ID: 24203987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Accurate Interpretation of HER2 Immunohistochemical Scores 0 and 1+ in Breast Cancer.
    Wu S; Yue M; Zhang J; Li X; Li Z; Zhang H; Wang X; Han X; Cai L; Shang J; Jia Z; Wang X; Li J; Liu Y
    Mod Pathol; 2023 Mar; 36(3):100054. PubMed ID: 36788100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancer.
    Dy A; Nguyen NJ; Meyer J; Dawe M; Shi W; Androutsos D; Fyles A; Liu FF; Done S; Khademi A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1283. PubMed ID: 38218973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ki 67 assessment in breast cancer in an Egyptian population: a comparative study between manual assessment on optical microscopy and digital quantitative assessment.
    Ayad E; Soliman A; Anis SE; Salem AB; Hu P; Dong Y
    Diagn Pathol; 2018 Aug; 13(1):63. PubMed ID: 30153851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ki-67 Quantification in Breast Cancer by Digital Imaging AI Software and its Concordance with Manual Method.
    Zehra T; Shams M; Ahmad Z; Chundriger Q; Ahmed A; Jaffar N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 May; 33(5):544-547. PubMed ID: 37190690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
    Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential immunohistochemistry and virtual image reconstruction using a single slide for quantitative KI67 measurement in breast cancer.
    Serna G; Simonetti S; Fasani R; Pagliuca F; Guardia X; Gallego P; Jimenez J; Peg V; Saura C; Eppenberger-Castori S; Ramon Y Cajal S; Terracciano L; Nuciforo P
    Breast; 2020 Oct; 53():102-110. PubMed ID: 32707454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An International Ki67 Reproducibility Study in Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma.
    Papathomas TG; Pucci E; Giordano TJ; Lu H; Duregon E; Volante M; Papotti M; Lloyd RV; Tischler AS; van Nederveen FH; Nose V; Erickson L; Mete O; Asa SL; Turchini J; Gill AJ; Matias-Guiu X; Skordilis K; Stephenson TJ; Tissier F; Feelders RA; Smid M; Nigg A; Korpershoek E; van der Spek PJ; Dinjens WN; Stubbs AP; de Krijger RR
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Apr; 40(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 26685085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer.
    Rimm DL; Leung SCY; McShane LM; Bai Y; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Bayani J; Chang MC; Dean M; Denkert C; Enwere EK; Galderisi C; Gholap A; Hugh JC; Jadhav A; Kornaga EN; Laurinavicius A; Levenson R; Lima J; Miller K; Pantanowitz L; Piper T; Ruan J; Srinivasan M; Virk S; Wu Y; Yang H; Hayes DF; Nielsen TO; Dowsett M
    Mod Pathol; 2019 Jan; 32(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 30143750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ki67 reproducibility using digital image analysis: an inter-platform and inter-operator study.
    Acs B; Pelekanou V; Bai Y; Martinez-Morilla S; Toki M; Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Rimm DL
    Lab Invest; 2019 Jan; 99(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 30181553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.
    Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Dasevicius D; Elie N; Iqbal Y; Bor C
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(2):R35. PubMed ID: 24708745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.