These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33840339)

  • 21. Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.
    De Sousa KC; Swanepoel W; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):442-450. PubMed ID: 31425362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C; Houtgast T
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise?
    Warzybok A; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():88-99. PubMed ID: 26344170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The digit triplet test as a self-test for hearing screening at the age of school-entry.
    Denys S; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Int J Audiol; 2022 May; 61(5):408-415. PubMed ID: 34120558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech Recognition Abilities in Normal-Hearing Children 4 to 12 Years of Age in Stationary and Interrupted Noise.
    Koopmans WJA; Goverts ST; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 29554035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving the efficiency of the digit triplet test using digit scoring with variable adaptive step sizes.
    Denys S; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):670-677. PubMed ID: 31187664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version.
    Watson CS; Kidd GR; Miller JD; Smits C; Humes LE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):757-67. PubMed ID: 23169193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Automated Speech Audiometry: Can It Work Using Open-Source Pre-Trained Kaldi-NL Automatic Speech Recognition?
    Araiza-Illan G; Meyer L; Truong KP; Başkent D
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241229057. PubMed ID: 38483979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimization of the Speech Test Material in a Group of Hearing Impaired Subjects: A Feasibility Study for Multilingual Digit Triplet Test Development.
    Masalski M; Adamczyk M; Morawski K
    Audiol Res; 2021 Jul; 11(3):342-356. PubMed ID: 34287230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is the digit triplet test an effective and acceptable way to assess speech recognition in adults using cochlear implants in a home environment?
    Cullington HE; Aidi T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Mar; 18(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 28120703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Remote self-report and speech-in-noise measures predict clinical audiometric thresholds.
    Zadeh LM; Brennan V; Swanepoel W; Lin L; Moore DR
    medRxiv; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35821983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Language-Independent Hearing Screening Based on Masked Recognition of Ecological Sounds.
    Denys S; De Laat J; Dreschler W; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519866566. PubMed ID: 32516059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation.
    Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):455-65. PubMed ID: 23772828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Discrimination of degrees of auditory performance from the digits-in-noise test based on hearing status.
    Armstrong NM; Oosterloo BC; Croll PH; Ikram MA; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 59(12):897-904. PubMed ID: 32673129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.
    Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Brand T; Buschermöhle M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of a Computer-Administered Version of the Digits-in-Noise Test for Hearing Screening in the United States.
    Folmer RL; Vachhani J; McMillan GP; Watson C; Kidd GR; Feeney MP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 28240983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA; de Laat JAPM
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):967-975. PubMed ID: 28936876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.