These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years. Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term outcomes of isolated mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in different age groups of propensity-matched patients. Rokui S; Gottschalk B; Peng D; Groenewoud R; Ye J Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Jul; 66(1):. PubMed ID: 38936344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival and outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years. Chikwe J; Chiang YP; Egorova NN; Itagaki S; Adams DH JAMA; 2015 Apr; 313(14):1435-42. PubMed ID: 25871669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is it worth repairing rheumatic mitral valve disease in children? Long-term outcomes of an aggressive approach to rheumatic mitral valve repair compared to replacement in young patients. Krishna Moorthy PS; Sivalingam S; Dillon J; Kong PK; Yakub MA Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 28(2):191-198. PubMed ID: 30085022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes? Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Similar long-term survival after isolated bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement: A propensity-matched analysis. Attia T; Yang Y; Svensson LG; Toth AJ; Rajeswaran J; Blackstone EH; Johnston DR; J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Nov; 164(5):1444-1455.e4. PubMed ID: 33892946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease. Hammermeister KE; Sethi GK; Henderson WG; Oprian C; Kim T; Rahimtoola S N Engl J Med; 1993 May; 328(18):1289-96. PubMed ID: 8469251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mitral Valve Repair vs. Replacement by Different Etiologies - A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Lee HA; Chang FC; Yeh JK; Tung YC; Wu VC; Hsieh MJ; Chen CY; Yeh CH; Chu PH; Chen SW Circ J; 2024 Mar; 88(4):568-578. PubMed ID: 38281764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis. Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: time-related outcomes and risk factors. Alsoufi B; Al-Halees Z; Fadel B; Al-Wesabi A; Al-Ahmadi M; Joufan M; Siblini G; Canver CC J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 20583397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]