These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33840468)
21. Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease: valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement. Kim JB; Kim HJ; Moon DH; Jung SH; Choo SJ; Chung CH; Song H; Lee JW Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 May; 37(5):1039-46. PubMed ID: 20036134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Meta-Analysis Comparing Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Mitral Valve Replacement in Degenerated Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve. Ismayl M; Abbasi MA; Mostafa MR; Aboeata A; Vora AN; Ben-Dor I; Anavekar NS; Goldsweig AM Am J Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 189():98-107. PubMed ID: 36521415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old. Kaneko T; Aranki S; Javed Q; McGurk S; Shekar P; Davidson M; Cohn L J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24079878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improved long-term survival for rheumatic mitral valve repair compared to replacement in the young. Remenyi B; Webb R; Gentles T; Russell P; Finucane K; Lee M; Wilson N World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg; 2013 Apr; 4(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 23799728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical outcomes in 1731 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for rheumatic valve disease. Kim WK; Kim HJ; Kim JB; Jung SH; Choo SJ; Chung CH; Lee JW Heart; 2018 May; 104(10):841-848. PubMed ID: 29146626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contemporary outcomes of aortic and mitral valve surgery for rheumatic heart disease in sub-Saharan Africa. Tamirat S; Mazine A; Stevens LM; Agwar F; Dejene K; Bedru M; Dessie A; Lebon JS; Bouchard D J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Dec; 162(6):1714-1725.e2. PubMed ID: 33168165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcomes of Surgical Mitral and Aortic Valve Replacements Among Kidney Transplant Candidates: Implications for Valve Selection. Ngendahimana DK; Deo SV; Sundaram V; Lentine KL; Herzog CA; Al Dahabreh L; Srinivas TR; Chavin KD; Sarabu N J Am Heart Assoc; 2021 Feb; 10(5):e018971. PubMed ID: 33599143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mitral valve repair and replacement for rheumatic disease. Yau TM; El-Ghoneimi YA; Armstrong S; Ivanov J; David TE J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Jan; 119(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 10612761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Primary triple valve surgery for advanced rheumatic heart disease in Mainland China: a single-center experience with 871 clinical cases. Han QQ; Xu ZY; Zhang BR; Zou LJ; Hao JH; Huang SD Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 17336080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis. McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bioprosthetic vs. Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement for Rheumatic Heart Disease in Patients Aged 50-70 Years. Yu J; Wang W Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():904958. PubMed ID: 35711344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of mitral valve disease etiology on the outcomes of mechanical and biological valve replacement: retrospective cohort study. Chen CY; Chang FC; Lin CP; Chan YH; Wu VC; Cheng YT; Chu PH; Chou AH; Yeh CH; Chen SW Int J Surg; 2024 Jun; 110(6):3495-3503. PubMed ID: 38498356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the utilization and in-hospital outcomes of surgical mitral valve replacement in Spain (2001-2015). López-de-Andrés A; de Miguel-Díez J; Muñoz-Rivas N; Hernández-Barrera V; Méndez-Bailón M; de Miguel-Yanes JM; Jiménez-García R Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2019 May; 18(1):60. PubMed ID: 31077189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Head SJ; Çelik M; Kappetein AP Eur Heart J; 2017 Jul; 38(28):2183-2191. PubMed ID: 28444168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Risk factors and outcomes with surgical bioprosthetic mitral valve dysfunction. Gwak SY; Ko KY; Cho I; Hong GR; Ha JW; Shim CY Heart; 2022 Dec; 109(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 36371666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Survival and long-term outcomes after mitral valve replacement in patients aged 18 to 50 years. Schnittman SR; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Adams DH; Egorova NN; Chikwe J J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jan; 155(1):96-102.e11. PubMed ID: 28942968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Durability of Biological Valves Implanted in Aortic or Mitral Positions: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Chen CY; Lin CP; Hung KC; Chan YH; Wu VC; Cheng YT; Yeh JK; Chu PH; Chou AH; Chen SW Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 Oct; 116(4):751-757. PubMed ID: 37356516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mechanical vs Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Younger Than 70 Years of Age: A Hazard Ratio Meta-analysis. Leviner DB; Witberg G; Levi A; Landes U; Schwartz N; Shiran A; Kornowski R; Sharoni E Can J Cardiol; 2022 Mar; 38(3):355-364. PubMed ID: 34954316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves for mitral valve replacement in patients < 70 years: an updated pairwise meta-analysis. Ahmed A; Awad AK; Varghese KS; Sehgal VS; Hisham K; George J; Pandey R; Vega E; Polizzi M; Mathew DM Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Feb; 72(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 37414971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]