160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33843467)
1. Assessment of fouling mechanisms on reverse osmosis (RO) membrane during permeation of 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) solutions.
Moreira CG; Santos HG; Bila DM; da Fonseca FV
Environ Technol; 2022 Aug; 43(20):3084-3096. PubMed ID: 33843467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Removal of micropollutants and NOM in carbon nanotube-UF membrane system from seawater.
Heo J; Joseph L; Yoon Y; Park YG; Her N; Sohn J; Yoon SH
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(11):2737-44. PubMed ID: 22049773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of seawater reverse osmosis fouling and its relationship to pretreatment type.
Kumar M; Adham SS; Pearce WR
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Mar; 40(6):2037-44. PubMed ID: 16570633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of feed solution characteristics and membrane fouling on the removal of THMs by UF/NF/RO membranes.
Fang C; Ou T; Wang X; Rui M; Chu W
Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 260():127625. PubMed ID: 32758776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined reverse osmosis and UV/H
Moreira CG; de Souza LC; Castor Neto TC; Gomes G; Bila DM; Fonseca FV
Environ Technol; 2023 Aug; 44(20):3108-3120. PubMed ID: 35259064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Membrane biorreactor, reverse osmosis and UV/H
Mesquita IS; Borges CP; Fonseca FVD
J Environ Manage; 2022 May; 310():114760. PubMed ID: 35219206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethinylestradiol removal of membrane bioreactor effluent by reverse osmosis and UV/H
Fonseca MJDC; Silva JRPD; Borges CP; Fonseca FVD
J Environ Manage; 2021 Mar; 282():111948. PubMed ID: 33486235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of membrane fouling substances on the rejection of N-nitrosamines by reverse osmosis.
Fujioka T; Kodamatani H; Aizawa H; Gray S; Ishida KP; Nghiem LD
Water Res; 2017 Jul; 118():187-195. PubMed ID: 28431351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of water matrix on the rejection of neutral pharmaceutically active compound by thin-film composite nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Shah IA; Ali S; Yang Z; Ihsanullah I; Huang H
Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135211. PubMed ID: 35660049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of chlorine disinfection on the membrane fouling potential of bacterial strains isolated from fouled reverse osmosis membranes.
Wang YH; Wu YH; Yu T; Zhao XH; Tong X; Bai Y; Huo ZY; Hu HY
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 693():133579. PubMed ID: 31376757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrafiltration significantly increased the scaling potential of municipal secondary effluent on reverse osmosis membranes.
Tong X; Zhang ZW; Wu YH; Bai Y; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Hu HY
Water Res; 2022 Jul; 220():118672. PubMed ID: 35635920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fouling characteristics of reverse osmosis membranes at different positions of a full-scale plant for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Tang F; Hu HY; Sun LJ; Sun YX; Shi N; Crittenden JC
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():329-336. PubMed ID: 26760485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of fouling on separation performance by forward osmosis: the role of specific organic foulants.
Zheng L; Price WE; Nghiem LD
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):33758-33769. PubMed ID: 29766436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
