These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33843467)
21. Hydrophilic, bactericidal nanoheater-enabled reverse osmosis membranes to improve fouling resistance. Ray JR; Tadepalli S; Nergiz SZ; Liu KK; You L; Tang Y; Singamaneni S; Jun YS ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Jun; 7(21):11117-26. PubMed ID: 25941970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Different bacterial species and their extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) significantly affected reverse osmosis (RO) membrane fouling potentials in wastewater reclamation. Yu T; Sun H; Chen Z; Wang YH; Huo ZY; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Jin Y; Hu HY; Wu YH; Lu Y Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 644():486-493. PubMed ID: 29990899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Simulating and predicting the flux change of reverse osmosis membranes over time during wastewater reclamation caused by organic fouling. Tong X; Wu YH; Wang YH; Bai Y; Zhao XH; Luo LW; Mao Y; Ikuno N; Hu HY Environ Int; 2020 Jul; 140():105744. PubMed ID: 32353670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment. Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Does Surface Roughness Necessarily Increase the Fouling Propensity of Polyamide Reverse Osmosis Membranes by Humic Acid? Gan Q; Wu C; Long L; Peng LE; Yang Z; Guo H; Tang CY Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Feb; 57(6):2548-2556. PubMed ID: 36719958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Removal of pharmaceutically active compounds from water sources using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: Comparison of removal efficiencies and in-depth analysis of rejection mechanisms. Matin A; Jillani SMS; Baig U; Ihsanullah I; Alhooshani K J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 338():117682. PubMed ID: 37003228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Removal mechanisms of 17β-estradiol and 17α-ethinylestradiol in membrane bioreactors. Yang W; Zhou H; Cicek N Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1263-9. PubMed ID: 22828304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the hybrid system combining electrocoagulation, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for biologically treated textile effluent: Treatment efficiency and membrane fouling. Güneş E; Gönder ZB J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 294():113042. PubMed ID: 34126531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pretreatment for alleviation of RO membrane fouling in dyeing wastewater reclamation. Chen GQ; Wu YH; Tan YJ; Chen Z; Tong X; Bai Y; Luo LW; Wang HB; Xu YQ; Zhang ZW; Ikuno N; Hu HY Chemosphere; 2022 Apr; 292():133471. PubMed ID: 34974050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of organic fouling on the removal of radionuclides by reverse osmosis membranes. Ding S; Yang Y; Li C; Huang H; Hou LA Water Res; 2016 May; 95():174-84. PubMed ID: 26994696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Non-destructive approaches for assessing biofouling of household reverse osmosis membranes. Markwardt SD; Ronnie N; Camper AK Biofouling; 2018 Aug; 34(7):740-752. PubMed ID: 30270657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Surface functionalization of reverse osmosis membranes with sulfonic groups for simultaneous mitigation of silica scaling and organic fouling. Guan YF; Boo C; Lu X; Zhou X; Yu HQ; Elimelech M Water Res; 2020 Oct; 185():116203. PubMed ID: 32731075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Rotating reverse osmosis: a dynamic model for flux and rejection. Lee S; Lueptow RM J Memb Sci; 2001 Oct; 192(2):129-43. PubMed ID: 11757575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Membrane fouling and anti-fouling strategies using RO retentate from a municipal water recycling plant as the feed for osmotic power generation. Chen SC; Amy GL; Chung TS Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():144-155. PubMed ID: 26492341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fouling behavior of nanofiltration membrane during the refining treatment of morphlines-dominant reverse osmosis concentrate. Li Y; Dong Y; Chen S; Wu Y; Wang J; Nie Y J Environ Manage; 2024 Jul; 364():121443. PubMed ID: 38878575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reverse osmosis membrane functionalized with aminated graphene oxide and polydopamine nanospheres plugging for enhanced NDMA rejection and anti-fouling performance. Khanzada NK; Rehman S; Kharraz JA; Farid MU; Khatri M; Hilal N; An AK Chemosphere; 2023 Oct; 338():139557. PubMed ID: 37478994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pre-ozonation for the mitigation of reverse osmosis (RO) membrane fouling by biopolymer: The roles of Ca Yin Z; Wen T; Li Y; Li A; Long C Water Res; 2020 Mar; 171():115437. PubMed ID: 31893554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Inorganic fouling mitigation by salinity cycling in batch reverse osmosis. Warsinger DM; Tow EW; Maswadeh LA; Connors GB; Swaminathan J; Lienhard V JH Water Res; 2018 Jun; 137():384-394. PubMed ID: 29573825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of feed solution chemistry on low pressure reverse osmosis filtration of cesium and strontium. Ding S; Yang Y; Huang H; Liu H; Hou LA J Hazard Mater; 2015 Aug; 294():27-34. PubMed ID: 25841084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]