These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33844086)

  • 21. Pancreatic Complications After Conventional Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy Versus Robotic Radical Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Guerra F; Giuliani G; Formisano G; Bianchi PP; Patriti A; Coratti A
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Oct; 28(10):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 29733241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effectiveness and safety of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of 12,401 gastric cancer patients.
    Jin T; Liu HD; Yang K; Chen ZH; Zhang YX; Hu JK
    Updates Surg; 2022 Feb; 74(1):267-281. PubMed ID: 34655427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study of 5402 Patients in China.
    Li ZY; Zhou YB; Li TY; Li JP; Zhou ZW; She JJ; Hu JK; Qian F; Shi Y; Tian YL; Gao GM; Gao RZ; Liang CC; Shi FY; Yang K; Wen Y; Zhao YL; Yu PW;
    Ann Surg; 2023 Jan; 277(1):e87-e95. PubMed ID: 34225299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic Gastrectomy Compared with Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I/II Gastric Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Hikage M; Fujiya K; Kamiya S; Tanizawa Y; Bando E; Notsu A; Mori K; Terashima M
    World J Surg; 2021 May; 45(5):1483-1494. PubMed ID: 33462703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effectiveness and safety of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Qiu H; Ai JH; Shi J; Shan RF; Yu DJ
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(7):1450-1463. PubMed ID: 31939422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Severity and incidence of complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification following robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective and propensity score-matched study.
    Wang WJ; Li HT; Yu JP; Su L; Guo CA; Chen P; Yan L; Li K; Ma YW; Wang L; Hu W; Li YM; Liu HB
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Oct; 33(10):3341-3354. PubMed ID: 30560498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of long-term outcomes after robotic versus laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: a propensity score-matching study.
    Li JT; Lin JX; Wang FH; Wang JB; Lu J; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang ZN; Lin JL; Zheng HL; Zheng CH; Huang CM; Li P
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8047-8059. PubMed ID: 35764839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes After Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer in Elderly Individuals: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.
    Zheng ZW; Lin M; Zheng HL; Chen QY; Lin JX; Xue Z; Xu BB; Li JT; Wei LH; Zheng HH; Lin J; Wang FH; Shen LL; Li WF; Zhang LK; Huang CM; Li P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):2679-2688. PubMed ID: 38142258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pancreatic thickness as a predictor of postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy.
    Hayashi K; Inaki N; Sakimura Y; Yamaguchi T; Obatake Y; Terai S; Kitamura H; Kadoya S; Bando H
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jul; 37(7):5358-5367. PubMed ID: 36997651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic surgery for gastric cancer in the west: A systematic review and meta-analyses of short-and long-term outcomes.
    Solaini L; Avanzolini A; Pacilio CA; Cucchetti A; Cavaliere D; Ercolani G
    Int J Surg; 2020 Nov; 83():170-175. PubMed ID: 32942065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Safe implementation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer under the requirements for universal health insurance coverage: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide registry database in Japan.
    Suda K; Yamamoto H; Nishigori T; Obama K; Yoda Y; Hikage M; Shibasaki S; Tanaka T; Kakeji Y; Inomata M; Kitagawa Y; Miyata H; Terashima M; Noshiro H; Uyama I
    Gastric Cancer; 2022 Mar; 25(2):438-449. PubMed ID: 34637042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Safety assessment of robotic gastrectomy and analysis of surgical learning process: a multicenter cohort study.
    Shimoike N; Nishigori T; Yamashita Y; Kondo M; Manaka D; Kadokawa Y; Itami A; Kanaya S; Hosogi H; Satoh S; Hata H; Kan T; Kawada H; Yamamoto M; Tanaka E; Tsunoda S; Hisamori S; Hida K; Ueno K; Tanaka S; Obama K;
    Gastric Cancer; 2022 Jul; 25(4):817-826. PubMed ID: 35416523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Solo surgery in robot-assisted gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Miyai H; Fujita K; Saito M; Fujii Y; Saito T; Kato J; Sawai M; Eguchi Y; Hirokawa T; Yamamoto M; Kobayashi K; Takiguchi S
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jul; 37(7):5726-5736. PubMed ID: 37308761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic gastrectomy was reliable option for overweight patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score matching study.
    Wei LH; Zheng HL; Xue Z; Xu BB; Zheng HH; Shen LL; Zheng ZW; Xie JW; Zheng CH; Huang CM; Chen QY; Li P
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3156-3166. PubMed ID: 38627257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficacy evaluation of subtotal and total gastrectomies in robotic surgery for gastric cancer compared with that in open and laparoscopic resections: a meta-analysis.
    Zong L; Seto Y; Aikou S; Takahashi T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103312. PubMed ID: 25068955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Initial Experience with Robotic Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: An Assessment of Short-Term Surgical Outcomes.
    Isobe T; Murakami N; Minami T; Tanaka Y; Kaku H; Umetani Y; Kizaki J; Aoyagi K; Kashihara M; Fujita F; Akagi Y
    Kurume Med J; 2022 Nov; 67(2.3):77-82. PubMed ID: 36123025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Potential advantages of robotic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study.
    Kumamoto T; Ishida Y; Igeta M; Hojo Y; Nakamura T; Kurahashi Y; Shinohara H
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):959-966. PubMed ID: 34716875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Short-term efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy
    Wang JB; Liu ZY; Chen QY; Zhong Q; Xie JW; Lin JX; Lu J; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang ZN; Lin JL; Zheng HL; Que SJ; Zheng CH; Huang CM; Li P
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Oct; 25(37):5641-5654. PubMed ID: 31602164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative study on perioperative outcomes between robotic versus laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy.
    Li Z; Qian F; Zhao Y; Chen J; Zhang F; Li Z; Wang X; Li P; Liu J; Wen Y; Feng Q; Shi Y; Yu P
    Int J Surg; 2022 Jun; 102():106636. PubMed ID: 35472517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Meta-analysis of the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy.
    Chuan L; Yan S; Pei-Wu Y
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015 Jun; 24(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 25467019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.