These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33845431)

  • 21. Machine learning techniques for analysis of hyperspectral images to determine quality of food products: A review.
    Saha D; Manickavasagan A
    Curr Res Food Sci; 2021; 4():28-44. PubMed ID: 33659896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomarkers for Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions: Use of Brain Imaging and Machine Learning.
    Boissoneault J; Sevel L; Letzen J; Robinson M; Staud R
    Curr Rheumatol Rep; 2017 Jan; 19(1):5. PubMed ID: 28144827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Corrigendum to "Machine learning-based speech recognition system for nursing documentation - A pilot study" [Int. J. Med. Inf. 178 (2023) 105213].
    Lee TY; Li CC; Chou KR; Chung MH; Hsiao ST; Guo SL; Yun HL; Wu HT
    Int J Med Inform; 2024 Jul; 187():105471. PubMed ID: 38719672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Novel Method of Classification in Knee Osteoarthritis: Machine Learning Application Versus Logistic Regression Model.
    Yang JH; Park JH; Jang SH; Cho J
    Ann Rehabil Med; 2020 Dec; 44(6):415-427. PubMed ID: 33440090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Automatic medical protocol classification using machine learning approaches.
    López-Úbeda P; Díaz-Galiano MC; Martín-Noguerol T; Luna A; Ureña-López LA; Martín-Valdivia MT
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Mar; 200():105939. PubMed ID: 33486337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict all-cause mortality using fitness data: the Henry ford exercIse testing (FIT) project.
    Sakr S; Elshawi R; Ahmed AM; Qureshi WT; Brawner CA; Keteyian SJ; Blaha MJ; Al-Mallah MH
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Dec; 17(1):174. PubMed ID: 29258510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Corrigendum: Multi-Kernel Learning with Dartel Improves Combined MRI-PET Classification of Alzheimer's Disease in AIBL Data: Group and Individual Analyses.
    Youssofzadeh V; McGuinness B; Maguire LP; Wong-Lin K
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():457. PubMed ID: 28912705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Corrigendum: Machine Learning and Feature Selection Methods for Disease Classification With Application to Lung Cancer Screening Image Data.
    Delzell DAP; Magnuson S; Peter T; Smith M; Smith BJ
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():866. PubMed ID: 32582545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.
    William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():15-22. PubMed ID: 30195423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Supervised Machine Learning Methods and Hyperspectral Imaging Techniques Jointly Applied for Brain Cancer Classification.
    Urbanos G; Martín A; Vázquez G; Villanueva M; Villa M; Jimenez-Roldan L; Chavarrías M; Lagares A; Juárez E; Sanz C
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 34073145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. MALDI-Imaging for Classification of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Histotypes from a Tissue Microarray Using Machine Learning Methods.
    Klein O; Kanter F; Kulbe H; Jank P; Denkert C; Nebrich G; Schmitt WD; Wu Z; Kunze CA; Sehouli J; Darb-Esfahani S; Braicu I; Lellmann J; Thiele H; Taube ET
    Proteomics Clin Appl; 2019 Jan; 13(1):e1700181. PubMed ID: 30471200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. MRI-Based Brain Tumor Classification Using Ensemble of Deep Features and Machine Learning Classifiers.
    Kang J; Ullah Z; Gwak J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33810176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A novel ensemble machine learning for robust microarray data classification.
    Peng Y
    Comput Biol Med; 2006 Jun; 36(6):553-73. PubMed ID: 15978569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stratification of cystic renal masses into benign and potentially malignant: applying machine learning to the bosniak classification.
    Miskin N; Qin L; Matalon SA; Tirumani SH; Alessandrino F; Silverman SG; Shinagare AB
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jan; 46(1):311-318. PubMed ID: 32613401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identifying bladder rupture following traumatic pelvic fracture: A machine learning approach.
    Hertz AM; Hertz NM; Johnsen NV
    Injury; 2020 Feb; 51(2):334-339. PubMed ID: 31866131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Corrigendum to "Tabu Search and Machine-Learning Classification of Benign and Malignant Proliferative Breast Lesions".
    Dhahri H; Rahmany I; Mahmood A; Al Maghayreh E; Elkilani W
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7638969. PubMed ID: 32695820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Securing Machine Learning in the Cloud: A Systematic Review of Cloud Machine Learning Security.
    Qayyum A; Ijaz A; Usama M; Iqbal W; Qadir J; Elkhatib Y; Al-Fuqaha A
    Front Big Data; 2020; 3():587139. PubMed ID: 33693420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Corrigendum to "Haemodynamic impacts of myocardial bridge length: A congenital heart disease" [Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed., 175 (2019) 25-33].
    Javadzadegan A; Moshfegh A; Mohammadi M; Askarian M; Mohammadi M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 175():243. PubMed ID: 31109446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Machine learning and dyslexia: Classification of individual structural neuro-imaging scans of students with and without dyslexia.
    Tamboer P; Vorst HCM; Ghebreab S; Scholte HS
    Neuroimage Clin; 2016; 11():508-514. PubMed ID: 27114899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of medical image classification accuracy among three machine learning methods.
    Maruyama T; Hayashi N; Sato Y; Hyuga S; Wakayama Y; Watanabe H; Ogura A; Ogura T
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(6):885-893. PubMed ID: 30223423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.