These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33845980)

  • 1. Approximate arithmetic training does not improve symbolic math in third and fourth grade children.
    Bugden S; Szkudlarek E; Brannon EM
    Trends Neurosci Educ; 2021 Mar; 22():100149. PubMed ID: 33845980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-symbolic approximate arithmetic training improves math performance in preschoolers.
    Park J; Bermudez V; Roberts RC; Brannon EM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Dec; 152():278-293. PubMed ID: 27596808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failure to replicate the benefit of approximate arithmetic training for symbolic arithmetic fluency in adults.
    Szkudlarek E; Park J; Brannon EM
    Cognition; 2021 Feb; 207():104521. PubMed ID: 33280814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving arithmetic performance with number sense training: an investigation of underlying mechanism.
    Park J; Brannon EM
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):188-200. PubMed ID: 25044247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approximate Arithmetic Training Improves Informal Math Performance in Low Achieving Preschoolers.
    Szkudlarek E; Brannon EM
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():606. PubMed ID: 29867624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Arithmetic operations without symbols are unimpaired in adults with math anxiety.
    Zaleznik E; Comeau O; Park J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jun; 76(6):1264-1274. PubMed ID: 35775834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of non-symbolic arithmetic training on symbolic arithmetic and the approximate number system.
    Au J; Jaeggi SM; Buschkuehl M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():1-12. PubMed ID: 29407240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to interpret cognitive training studies: A reply to Lindskog & Winman.
    Park J; Brannon EM
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():247-51. PubMed ID: 26972469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory in nonsymbolic approximate arithmetic processing: a dual-task study with preschoolers.
    Xenidou-Dervou I; van Lieshout EC; van der Schoot M
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(1):101-27. PubMed ID: 23855416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No evidence of learning in non-symbolic numerical tasks--A comment on Park and Brannon (2014).
    Lindskog M; Winman A
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():243-7. PubMed ID: 26972468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of mathematics in primary school: Magnitude comparison, verbal and spatial working memory measures.
    Caviola S; Colling LJ; Mammarella IC; Szűcs D
    Dev Sci; 2020 Nov; 23(6):e12957. PubMed ID: 32112457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction.
    Gilmore CK; McCarthy SE; Spelke ES
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7144):589-91. PubMed ID: 17538620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operational momentum during children's approximate arithmetic relates to symbolic math skills and space-magnitude association.
    Jang S; Cho S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Jan; 213():105253. PubMed ID: 34419664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling.
    Gilmore CK; McCarthy SE; Spelke ES
    Cognition; 2010 Jun; 115(3):394-406. PubMed ID: 20347435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Approximate multiplication in young children prior to multiplication instruction.
    Qu C; Szkudlarek E; Brannon EM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Jul; 207():105116. PubMed ID: 33677334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A two-minute paper-and-pencil test of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing explains variability in primary school children's arithmetic competence.
    Nosworthy N; Bugden S; Archibald L; Evans B; Ansari D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67918. PubMed ID: 23844126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The developmental onset of symbolic approximation: beyond nonsymbolic representations, the language of numbers matters.
    Xenidou-Dervou I; Gilmore C; van der Schoot M; van Lieshout EC
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():487. PubMed ID: 25972822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preschoolers prior formal mathematics education engage numerical magnitude representation rather than counting principles in symbolic ±1 arithmetic: Evidence from the operational momentum effect.
    Haman M; Lipowska K
    Dev Sci; 2023 May; 26(3):e13322. PubMed ID: 36069221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changing the precision of preschoolers' approximate number system representations changes their symbolic math performance.
    Wang JJ; Odic D; Halberda J; Feigenson L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jul; 147():82-99. PubMed ID: 27061668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The approximate number system and domain-general abilities as predictors of math ability in children with normal hearing and hearing loss.
    Bull R; Marschark M; Nordmann E; Sapere P; Skene WA
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2018 Jun; 36(2):236-254. PubMed ID: 28851061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.