282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33846061)
1. Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening.
Son D; Phillips J; Mehta TS; Mehta R; Brook A; Dialani VM
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S229-S238. PubMed ID: 33846061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient Experience of Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Miller MM; Mayorov S; Ganti R; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Caley M; Jahjah J; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA; Rooney TB
J Breast Imaging; 2024 May; 6(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 38537570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis of Patient Preferences for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI as Supplemental Screening Options for Breast Cancer.
Berg WA; Bandos AI; Sava MG
J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Aug; 20(8):758-768. PubMed ID: 37394083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging Preferences in Women With a History of Breast Cancer Receiving Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Moravia LP; Mosaddhegi J; Mehta TS; Qureshi MM; Phillips J
J Breast Imaging; 2023 Nov; 5(6):685-694. PubMed ID: 38141234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluation of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities to mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts and average or intermediate breast cancer risk in US healthcare.
Blankenburg M; Sánchez-Collado I; Soyemi BO; Åkerborg Ö; Caleyachetty A; Harris J; Morris E; Newstead G; Lobig F
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):850-861. PubMed ID: 37278659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening.
Coffey K; Jochelson MS
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110513. PubMed ID: 36108478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient Characteristics Associated With Patient-Reported Deterrents to Adjunct Breast Cancer Screening of Patients With Dense Breasts.
Miller MM; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Nov; 217(5):1069-1079. PubMed ID: 33147054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of contrast-enhanced mammography in surgical management of breast cancers for women with dense breasts: a dual-center, multi-disciplinary study in Asia.
Goh Y; Chou CP; Chan CW; Buhari SA; Hartman M; Tang SW; Ng CWQ; Pillay P; Chua W; Jagmohan P; Sterling E; Wong YM; Tan LY; Ong HY; Pan HB; Lee HS; Hung BH; Quek ST
Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8226-8237. PubMed ID: 35788756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography, Abbreviated Breast MRI, and Standard Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening.
Lawson MB; Partridge SC; Hippe DS; Rahbar H; Lam DL; Lee CI; Lowry KP; Scheel JR; Parsian S; Li I; Biswas D; Bryant ML; Lee JM
Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230576. PubMed ID: 37581498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density.
Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Su YR; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Onega T; O'Meara ES; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Wernli K; Miglioretti DL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2024 Feb; 116(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 37897090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus MRI in the high-risk screening setting: patient preferences and attitudes.
Phillips J; Miller MM; Mehta TS; Fein-Zachary V; Nathanson A; Hori W; Monahan-Earley R; Slanetz PJ
Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():193-197. PubMed ID: 28107737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of Supplemental Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: Findings From an Umbrella Review and Primary Studies Analysis.
Lobig F; Caleyachetty A; Forrester L; Morris E; Newstead G; Harris J; Blankenburg M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Jul; 23(5):478-490. PubMed ID: 37202338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S
BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Use of contrast-enhanced mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer].
Fischer U; Diekmann F; Helbich T; Preibsch H; Püsken M; Wenkel E; Wienbeck S; Fallenberg EM
Radiologie (Heidelb); 2023 Dec; 63(12):916-924. PubMed ID: 37889284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts to Reduce False-Positive Diagnoses.
Verburg E; van Gils CH; Bakker MF; Viergever MA; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; Gilhuijs KGA
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jul; 55(7):438-444. PubMed ID: 32149858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient perspectives on repeated contrast-enhanced mammography and magnetic resonance during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer.
Pires-Gonçalves L; Henriques Abreu M; Ferrão A; Guimarães Dos Santos A; Aguiar AT; Gouvêa M; Henrique R
Acta Radiol; 2023 May; 64(5):1816-1822. PubMed ID: 36575580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Are The Netherlands ready for personalized breast cancer screening? Abbreviated breast MRI and contrast-enhanced mammography for screening in women with dense breasts].
Raat HPJ; Lobbes MBI; Veldhuis WB
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2021 Jul; 165():. PubMed ID: 34346656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast enhanced mammography: focus on frequently encountered benign and malignant diagnoses.
Yang ML; Bhimani C; Roth R; Germaine P
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 36691077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Current status and future challenges.
van Nijnatten TJA; Morscheid S; Baltzer PAT; Clauser P; Alcantara R; Kuhl CK; Wildberger JE
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 171():111312. PubMed ID: 38237520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
