These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Activity profile relationships between structurally similar promiscuous compounds. Hu Y; Bajorath J Eur J Med Chem; 2013 Nov; 69():393-8. PubMed ID: 24077530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiating Inhibitors of Closely Related Protein Kinases with Single- or Multi-Target Activity via Explainable Machine Learning and Feature Analysis. Feldmann C; Bajorath J Biomolecules; 2022 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35454147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protein promiscuity: drug resistance and native functions--HIV-1 case. Fernández A; Tawfik DS; Berkhout B; Sanders R; Kloczkowski A; Sen T; Jernigan B J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2005 Jun; 22(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 15842167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the tendency of therapeutic target proteins to bind promiscuous or selective compounds. Hu Y; Bajorath J PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126838. PubMed ID: 26000736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Matched molecular pair analysis of small molecule microarray data identifies promiscuity cliffs and reveals molecular origins of extreme compound promiscuity. Dimova D; Hu Y; Bajorath J J Med Chem; 2012 Nov; 55(22):10220-8. PubMed ID: 23050678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Data structures for computational compound promiscuity analysis and exemplary applications to inhibitors of the human kinome. Miljković F; Bajorath J J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Jan; 34(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 31792884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine Learning Distinguishes with High Accuracy between Pan-Assay Interference Compounds That Are Promiscuous or Represent Dark Chemical Matter. Jasial S; Gilberg E; Blaschke T; Bajorath J J Med Chem; 2018 Nov; 61(22):10255-10264. PubMed ID: 30422657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How promiscuous are pharmaceutically relevant compounds? A data-driven assessment. Hu Y; Bajorath J AAPS J; 2013 Jan; 15(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 23090085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting the multi-modal binding propensity of small molecules: towards an understanding of drug promiscuity. Park K; Lee S; Ahn HS; Kim D Mol Biosyst; 2009 Aug; 5(8):844-53. PubMed ID: 19603120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying Promiscuous Compounds with Activity against Different Target Classes. Feldmann C; Miljković F; Yonchev D; Bajorath J Molecules; 2019 Nov; 24(22):. PubMed ID: 31752252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hit Dexter 2.0: Machine-Learning Models for the Prediction of Frequent Hitters. Stork C; Chen Y; Šícho M; Kirchmair J J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Mar; 59(3):1030-1043. PubMed ID: 30624935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analyzing compound activity records and promiscuity degrees in light of publication statistics. Hu Y; Bajorath J F1000Res; 2016; 5():. PubMed ID: 27347396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structured data sets of compounds with multi-target and corresponding single-target activity from biological assays. Feldmann C; Yonchev D; Bajorath J Future Sci OA; 2021 Mar; 7(5):FSO685. PubMed ID: 34046190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feature importance correlation from machine learning indicates functional relationships between proteins and similar compound binding characteristics. Rodríguez-Pérez R; Bajorath J Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14245. PubMed ID: 34244588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]