246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33847515)
21. Accuracy of Sampling PI-RADS 4-5 Index Lesions Alone by MRI-guided In-bore Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Kilic M; Vural M; Coskun B; Acar Ö; Saglican Y; Akpek S; Esen T
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 31054811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With PI-RADS, Version 2, in Patients With Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: Which Radiologic Characteristics Can Predict Unfavorable Disease?
Kim H; Pak S; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Kim M; You D; Jeong IG; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Feb; 18(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 31640913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimum Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Cores Needed for Prostate Cancer Detection: Multivariable Retrospective, Lesion Based Analyses of Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Tian Z; Karakiewicz PI; Tilki D; Fisch M; Maurer T; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2020 Feb; 203(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 31483694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate underestimates tumour volume of small visible lesions.
Sorce G; Stabile A; Lucianò R; Motterle G; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Pellegrino F; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Jeffrey Karnes R; Guccini I; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2022 Feb; 129(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 34038039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prognostic Significance for Long-Term Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Cancer: Evaluation with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.
Kim R; Kim CK; Park JJ; Kim JH; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 30672165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results.
Park SY; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Rha KH; Hong SJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2502-9. PubMed ID: 26560721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predictive clinical features for negative histopathology of MRI/Ultrasound-fusion-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high likelihood of cancer at prostate MRI: Analysis from a urologic outpatient clinic1.
Apfelbeck M; Pfitzinger P; Bischoff R; Rath L; Buchner A; Mumm JN; Schlenker B; Stief CG; Chaloupka M; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 76(4):503-511. PubMed ID: 33337358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Index tumor volume on MRI as a predictor of clinical and pathologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy.
Sugano D; Sidana A; Jain AL; Calio B; Gaur S; Maruf M; Merino M; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Aug; 51(8):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 31098818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol.
Luzzago S; Musi G; Catellani M; Russo A; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Conti A; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Mirone V; Petralia G; de Cobelli O
Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 29734177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.
Radtke JP; Takhar M; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Erho N; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Ong K; Davicioni E; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jul; 4(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 28753844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: primer for radiologists.
Shieh AC; Guler E; Ojili V; Paspulati RM; Elliott R; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4040-4051. PubMed ID: 32390076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic Performance of
Margel D; Bernstine H; Groshar D; Ber Y; Nezrit O; Segal N; Yakimov M; Baniel J; Domachevsky L
Radiology; 2021 Nov; 301(2):379-386. PubMed ID: 34463555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic significance of PI-RADS 5 lesions in patients treated by radical prostatectomy.
Fiard G; Seigneurin A; Roumiguié M; Albisinni S; Anract J; Assenmacher G; Barry Delongchamps N; Dariane C; Feyaerts A; Fourcade A; Fournier G; Gontero P; Mastroianni R; Oderda M; Peltier A; Roumeguère T; Saussez T; Simone G; Van Damme J; Descotes JL; Ploussard G; Diamand R
World J Urol; 2023 May; 41(5):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 36971827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Risk Stratification of Patients Candidate to Radical Prostatectomy Based on Clinical and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters: Development and External Validation of Novel Risk Groups.
Mazzone E; Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Marra G; Valerio M; Campi R; Mari A; Minervini A; Serni S; Moschini M; Marquis A; Beauval JB; van den Bergh R; Rahota RG; Soeterik T; Roumiguiè M; Afferi L; Zhuang J; Guo H; Mattei A; Gontero P; Cucchiara V; Stabile A; Fossati N; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2022 Feb; 81(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 34399996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An integrated nomogram combining deep learning, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring, and clinical variables for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI: a retrospective multicentre study.
Hiremath A; Shiradkar R; Fu P; Mahran A; Rastinehad AR; Tewari A; Tirumani SH; Purysko A; Ponsky L; Madabhushi A
Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Jul; 3(7):e445-e454. PubMed ID: 34167765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic Accuracy and Observer Agreement of the MRI Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting Assessment Score.
Pecoraro M; Turkbey B; Purysko AS; Girometti R; Giannarini G; Villeirs G; Roberto M; Catalano C; Padhani AR; Barentsz JO; Panebianco V
Radiology; 2022 Aug; 304(2):342-350. PubMed ID: 35536130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MR-based prognostic nomogram for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Zhang YD; Wu CJ; Bao ML; Li H; Wang XN; Liu XS; Shi HB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):586-596. PubMed ID: 27654116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
