These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3384775)

  • 1. Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting.
    Kircher JC; Raskin DC
    J Appl Psychol; 1988 May; 73(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 3384775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polygraph lie detection on real events in a laboratory setting.
    Bradley MT; Cullen MC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 1):1051-8. PubMed ID: 8321576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examiner reliability in polygraph chart analysis: identification of physiological responses.
    Edel EC; Jacoby J
    J Appl Psychol; 1975 Oct; 60(5):632-4. PubMed ID: 1176426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The polygraph in a psychiatric setting.
    Abrams S
    Am J Psychiatry; 1973 Jan; 130(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 4682754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tonic arousal during field polygraph tests in guilty vs. innocent suspects in Japan.
    Hira S; Furumitsu I
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 19499326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of selected variables on interpretation of polygraph records.
    Horvath F
    J Appl Psychol; 1977 Apr; 62(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 845110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effects of arousal level on the physiological responding on the Concealed Information Test].
    Ogawa T; Tsuruga M; Kobayashi T; Matsuda I; Hirota A; Suzuki N
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Oct; 78(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 18027587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal physiological effects of electrodermal lability in the detection of deception.
    Waid WM; Wilson SK; Orne MT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1981 Jun; 40(6):1118-25. PubMed ID: 7264879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of biofeedback on the detection of deception.
    Timm HW
    J Forensic Sci; 1987 May; 32(3):736-46. PubMed ID: 3598524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The comparison question polygraph test: a contrast of methods and scoring.
    Honts CR; Reavy R
    Physiol Behav; 2015 May; 143():15-26. PubMed ID: 25703188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physiological measures and the detection of deception.
    Podlesny JA; Raskin DC
    Psychol Bull; 1977 Jul; 84(4):782-99. PubMed ID: 331381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temperature effects on polygraph detection of concealed information.
    MacNeill AL; Bradley MT
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 26435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of false memories on the Concealed Information Test].
    Zaitsu W
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2012 Oct; 83(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 23214081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. History of the polygraphy, an instrument for the detection of deception.
    Geddes LA
    Biomed Eng; 1973 Apr; 8(4):154-6. PubMed ID: 4572997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External validity of Concealed Information Test experiment: Comparison of respiration, skin conductance, and heart rate between experimental and field card tests.
    Zaitsu W
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1100-7. PubMed ID: 27031043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The psychiatrist and the polygraph.
    Lerner J
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1969 Oct; 17(10):979-84. PubMed ID: 5343859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alcohol and the psychophysiological detection of deception.
    Bradley MT; Ainsworth D
    Psychophysiology; 1984 Jan; 21(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 6701246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of physiological indices in detection of deception.
    Thackray RI; Orne MT
    Psychophysiology; 1968 Jan; 4(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 5636306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The objective use of multiple physiological indices in the detection of deception.
    Cutrow RJ; Parks A; Lucas N; Thomas K
    Psychophysiology; 1972 Nov; 9(6):578-88. PubMed ID: 5076025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Act of Answering Questions Elicited Differentiated Responses in a Concealed Information Test.
    Otsuka T; Mizutani M; Yagi A; Katayama J
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1769-1775. PubMed ID: 29665043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.