These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33848559)

  • 1. Visual and haptic perceptibility of 3D printed skeletal models in orthognathic surgery.
    Shujaat S; da Costa Senior O; Shaheen E; Politis C; Jacobs R
    J Dent; 2021 Jun; 109():103660. PubMed ID: 33848559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality and haptic feedback of three-dimensionally printed models for simulating dental implant surgery.
    Wang X; Shujaat S; Shaheen E; Jacobs R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):660-667. PubMed ID: 35513918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Materials Used for 3D-Printing Temporal Bone Models to Simulate Surgical Dissection.
    McMillan A; Kocharyan A; Dekker SE; Kikano EG; Garg A; Huang VW; Moon N; Cooke M; Mowry SE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Dec; 129(12):1168-1173. PubMed ID: 32363889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Various 3D printed materials mimic bone ultrasonographically: 3D printed models of the equine cervical articular process joints as a simulator for ultrasound guided intra-articular injections.
    Beaulieu A; Linden AZ; Phillips J; Arroyo LG; Koenig J; Monteith G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220332. PubMed ID: 31386687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy.
    Zhang ZC; Li PL; Chu FT; Shen G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2019 Jul; 80(4):194-204. PubMed ID: 31172199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional printed final occlusal splint for orthognathic surgery: design and validation.
    Shaheen E; Sun Y; Jacobs R; Politis C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 27815012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Emir F; Ayyildiz S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3D printed bone models in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review.
    Meglioli M; Naveau A; Macaluso GM; Catros S
    3D Print Med; 2020 Oct; 6(1):30. PubMed ID: 33079298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of current additive manufacturing systems for orthodontic 3-dimensional printing.
    Akyalcin S; Rutkowski P; Arrigo M; Trotman CA; Kasper FK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 34579820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of 3D Printed Burr Hole Simulation Models Using 8 Different Materials.
    Dissanayaka N; Maclachlan LR; Alexander H; Redmond M; Carluccio D; Jules-Vandi L; Novak JI
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Aug; 176():e651-e663. PubMed ID: 37295464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology.
    Msallem B; Sharma N; Cao S; Halbeisen FS; Zeilhofer HF; Thieringer FM
    J Clin Med; 2020 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32192099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of a Patient-Specific, 3-Dimensionally Printed Endoscopic Sinus and Skull Base Surgical Model.
    Hsieh TY; Cervenka B; Dedhia R; Strong EB; Steele T
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jul; 144(7):574-579. PubMed ID: 29799965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D Printing for veterinary anatomy: An overview.
    Wilhite R; Wölfel I
    Anat Histol Embryol; 2019 Nov; 48(6):609-620. PubMed ID: 31702827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-Dimensional Printing for Craniofacial Surgery: A Single Institution's 5-Year Experience.
    Dumas BM; Nava A; Law HZ; Smartt J; Derderian C; Seaward JR; Kane AA; Hallac RR
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Jul; 56(6):729-734. PubMed ID: 30200785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of open-source software segmentation and paper-based printed three-dimensional models.
    Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M; Olszewski R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 44(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 26748414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing cost and print time estimates for six commercially-available 3D printers obtained through slicing software for clinically relevant anatomical models.
    Chen JV; Dang ABC; Dang A
    3D Print Med; 2021 Jan; 7(1):1. PubMed ID: 33404847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of desktop versus professional 3D printers for maxillofacial model production. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Shujaat S; Shaheen E; Jacobs R
    J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103741. PubMed ID: 34224792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of 3D Print Material for the Recreation of Patient-Specific Temporal Bone Models.
    Haffner M; Quinn A; Hsieh TY; Strong EB; Steele T
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 May; 127(5):338-343. PubMed ID: 29667491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do low-cost 3-dimensional printers produce suitable dental models?
    Pereira ABN; Almeida RC; Marassi C; Abdo Quintão CC; Carvalho FAR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jun; 161(6):858-865. PubMed ID: 35636876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
    Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.