227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33849076)
1. Characteristic chemical probing patterns of loop motifs improve prediction accuracy of RNA secondary structures.
Cao J; Xue Y
Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 May; 49(8):4294-4307. PubMed ID: 33849076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterizing RNA structures in vitro and in vivo with selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension sequencing (SHAPE-Seq).
Watters KE; Yu AM; Strobel EJ; Settle AH; Lucks JB
Methods; 2016 Jul; 103():34-48. PubMed ID: 27064082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring RNA structural codes with SHAPE chemistry.
Weeks KM; Mauger DM
Acc Chem Res; 2011 Dec; 44(12):1280-91. PubMed ID: 21615079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accurate SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure modeling, including pseudoknots.
Hajdin CE; Bellaousov S; Huggins W; Leonard CW; Mathews DH; Weeks KM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Apr; 110(14):5498-503. PubMed ID: 23503844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SHAPE-Seq 2.0: systematic optimization and extension of high-throughput chemical probing of RNA secondary structure with next generation sequencing.
Loughrey D; Watters KE; Settle AH; Lucks JB
Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Dec; 42(21):e165. PubMed ID: 25303992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE): quantitative RNA structure analysis at single nucleotide resolution.
Wilkinson KA; Merino EJ; Weeks KM
Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(3):1610-6. PubMed ID: 17406453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rtools: a web server for various secondary structural analyses on single RNA sequences.
Hamada M; Ono Y; Kiryu H; Sato K; Kato Y; Fukunaga T; Mori R; Asai K
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jul; 44(W1):W302-7. PubMed ID: 27131356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating chemical footprinting data into RNA secondary structure prediction.
Zarringhalam K; Meyer MM; Dotu I; Chuang JH; Clote P
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e45160. PubMed ID: 23091593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An iterated loop matching approach to the prediction of RNA secondary structures with pseudoknots.
Ruan J; Stormo GD; Zhang W
Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 14693809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A New Method to Predict RNA Secondary Structure Based on RNA Folding Simulation.
Liu Y; Zhao Q; Zhang H; Xu R; Li Y; Wei L
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2016; 13(5):990-995. PubMed ID: 26552091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping RNA Structure In Vitro with SHAPE Chemistry and Next-Generation Sequencing (SHAPE-Seq).
Watters KE; Lucks JB
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1490():135-62. PubMed ID: 27665597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of the RNA backbone: structural analysis of riboswitches by in-line probing and selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation and primer extension.
Wakeman CA; Winkler WC
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 540():173-91. PubMed ID: 19381560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phylogenetic and Chemical Probing Information as Soft Constraints in RNA Secondary Structure Prediction.
von Löhneysen S; Spicher T; Varenyk Y; Yao HT; Lorenz R; Hofacker I; Stadler PF
J Comput Biol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):549-563. PubMed ID: 38935442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [An iterative method for prediction of RNA secondary structures including pseudoknots based on minimum of free energy and covariance].
Wang ZX; Luo ZG; Guan NY; Yan FM; Jin X; Zhang W
Yi Chuan; 2007 Jul; 29(7):889-97. PubMed ID: 17646157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of consensus RNA secondary structures including pseudoknots.
Witwer C; Hofacker IL; Stadler PF
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2004; 1(2):66-77. PubMed ID: 17048382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlating SHAPE signatures with three-dimensional RNA structures.
Bindewald E; Wendeler M; Legiewicz M; Bona MK; Wang Y; Pritt MJ; Le Grice SF; Shapiro BA
RNA; 2011 Sep; 17(9):1688-96. PubMed ID: 21752927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A rule-based approach for RNA pseudoknot prediction.
Fu XZ; Wang H; Harrison RW; Harrison WL
Int J Data Min Bioinform; 2008; 2(1):78-93. PubMed ID: 18399329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. iFoldRNA v2: folding RNA with constraints.
Krokhotin A; Houlihan K; Dokholyan NV
Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2891-3. PubMed ID: 25910700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. RNA folding with soft constraints: reconciliation of probing data and thermodynamic secondary structure prediction.
Washietl S; Hofacker IL; Stadler PF; Kellis M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 May; 40(10):4261-72. PubMed ID: 22287623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SHAPE Selection (SHAPES) enrich for RNA structure signal in SHAPE sequencing-based probing data.
Poulsen LD; Kielpinski LJ; Salama SR; Krogh A; Vinther J
RNA; 2015 May; 21(5):1042-52. PubMed ID: 25805860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
