157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3384919)
1. Evaluation of rubella immune status by three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
Field PR; Ho DW; Cunningham AL
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 May; 26(5):990-4. PubMed ID: 3384919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the performance and reproducibility of various serological methods and diagnostic kits for the detection of rubella antibodies.
Enders G; Knotek F
J Virol Methods; 1985 May; 11(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 3891766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of rubella antibodies by hemagglutination inhibition, indirect fluorescent-antibody test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Zartarian MV; Friedly G; Peterson EM; de la Maza LM
J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Dec; 14(6):640-5. PubMed ID: 7037834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of haemagglutination test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and indirect immunofluorescence antibody test for determination of rubella immune status.
Hossain A; Ramia S; Bakir TM
J Trop Med Hyg; 1988 Aug; 91(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 3043010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosis of postnatally acquired rubella by use of three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for specific immunoglobulins G and M and single radial hemolysis for specific immunoglobulin G.
Field PR; Gong CM
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):951-8. PubMed ID: 6392326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rubella IgM antibody determination: comparison of two indirect and two capture commercial enzyme immunoassays.
Revello MG; Percivalle E; Zavattoni M; Gerna G
Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 2826972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of hemagglutination inhibition test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determining antibody to rubella virus.
Shekarchi IC; Sever JL; Tzan N; Ley A; Ward LC; Madden D
J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):850-4. PubMed ID: 7016910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with indirect hemagglutination and hemagglutination inhibition for determination of rubella virus antibody: evaluation of immune status with commercial reagents in a clinical laboratory.
Truant AL; Barksdale BL; Huber TW; Elliott LB
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jan; 17(1):106-8. PubMed ID: 6338030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of various serological methods and diagnostic kits for the detection of acute, recent, and previous rubella infection, vaccination, and congenital infections.
Enders G; Knotek F; Pacher U
J Med Virol; 1985 Jul; 16(3):219-32. PubMed ID: 2993493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Demonstration of Rubella-specific IgG and IgM antibody (sub) classes using the enzyme immunoassay (EIA)].
Doerr HW; Fleischer G; Wiesmann M
Immun Infekt; 1984 Feb; 12(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 6398271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of immune status in patients with low antibody titers for rubella virus.
Fayram SL; Akin S; Aarnaes SL; Peterson EM; de la Maza LM
J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Jan; 25(1):178-80. PubMed ID: 3539991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the latex agglutination test with the hemagglutination inhibition test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and neutralization test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus.
Meegan JM; Evans BK; Horstmann DM
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 16(4):644-9. PubMed ID: 7153314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enzygnost-Rubella: an enzyme immunoassay for screening and quantitation of antibodies to rubella virus.
Madsen RD; Witheiler AP; Coates SR; Rippe DF
Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Feb; 79(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 6337467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of commercially available diagnostic test kits for rubella.
Castellano GA; Madden DL; Hazzard GT; Cleghorn CS; Vails DV; Ley AC; Tzan NR; Sever JL
J Infect Dis; 1981 Apr; 143(4):578-84. PubMed ID: 7240800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of antibodies for rubella virus in human sera.
Cleary TJ; Cid A; Ellis B; Malkus H; Noto T; Halbert S; Castro A
Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol; 1978 Feb; 19(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 565527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of IgM antibodies against rubella virus: comparison of two indirect ELISAs and an anti-IgM capture immunoassay.
Enders G; Knotek F
J Med Virol; 1986 Aug; 19(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 3528389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of several test systems used for determination of rubella immune status.
Weissfeld AS; Gehle WD; Sonnenwirth AC
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jul; 16(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 7050167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Serologic test combinations for safe detection of rubella infections.
Enders G
Rev Infect Dis; 1985; 7 Suppl 1():S113-22. PubMed ID: 3890101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low level rubella immunity detected by ELISA and specific lymphocyte transformation.
Buimovici-Klein E; O'Beirne AJ; Millian SJ; Cooper LZ
Arch Virol; 1980; 66(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 7447708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the Ortho Rubella ELISA Test System.
Kasupski GJ; Lo PL; Gobin G; Leers WD
Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Feb; 81(2):230-2. PubMed ID: 6364783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
