157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3384919)
21. Comparative evaluation of commercial rubella virus antibody kits.
Wittenburg RA; Roberts MA; Elliott LB; Little LM
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Feb; 21(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 3972983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lack of association between titers of HAI antibody and whole-virus ELISA values for patients with congenital rubella syndrome.
Hancock EJ; Pot K; Puterman ML; Tingle AJ
J Infect Dis; 1986 Dec; 154(6):1031-3. PubMed ID: 3782867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Development and evaluation of a capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determination of rubella immunoglobulin M using monoclonal antibodies.
Gerna I; Zannino M; Revello MG; Petruzzelli E; Dovis M
J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Jun; 25(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 3597747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay of rubella antibody.
Kikuchi T; Kuno-Sakai H; Kimura M
Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 1983 Jul; 8(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 6367150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rubella antibodies detected by several commercial immunoassays in hemagglutination inhibition-negative sera.
Kleeman KT; Kiefer DJ; Halbert SP
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Nov; 18(5):1131-7. PubMed ID: 6643666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characterization of rubella virus-specific antibody responses by using a new synthetic peptide-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Mitchell LA; Zhang T; Ho M; Décarie D; Tingle AJ; Zrein M; Lacroix M
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jul; 30(7):1841-7. PubMed ID: 1629342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, hemagglutination inhibition, and passive latex agglutination for determination of rubella immune status.
Steece RS; Talley MS; Skeels MR; Lanier GA
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):140-2. PubMed ID: 3968201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Problems in determining immune status in borderline specimens in an enzyme immunoassay for rubella immunoglobulin G antibody.
Steece RS; Talley MS; Skeels MR; Lanier GA
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):923-5. PubMed ID: 6381532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison between a commercial ELISA, Rubazyme, and hemolysis-in-gel test for determination of rubella antibodies.
Grillner L; Forsgren M; Nordenfelt E
J Virol Methods; 1985 Feb; 10(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 3884643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Rubella immunity measured by hemagglutination inhibition and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Hornstein L; Swartz TA; Heimann M
Isr J Med Sci; 1985 Aug; 21(8):666-9. PubMed ID: 4044233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Multicenter evaluation of a 1-h enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for rubella serology.
Boteler WL; Barnes KJ; Buimovici-Klein E; O'Beirne AJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1140-4. PubMed ID: 6394616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin G in saliva by an amplification-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using monoclonal antibody to fluorescein isothiocyanate.
Vyse AJ; Brown DW; Cohen BJ; Samuel R; Nokes DJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Feb; 37(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 9889225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for measurement of antibody against cytomegalovirus and rubella virus in a single serum dilution.
van Loon AM; van der Logt JT; van der Veen J
J Clin Pathol; 1981 Jun; 34(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 6265504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Latex-agglutination test for rubella antibody: validity of positive results assessed by response to immunization and comparison with other tests.
Storch GA; Myers N
J Infect Dis; 1984 Mar; 149(3):459-64. PubMed ID: 6371155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hemagglutination inhibition, single radial hemolysis, and ELISA tests for the detection of IgG and IgM to rubella virus.
Champsaur H; Dussaix E; Tournier P
J Med Virol; 1980; 5(4):273-86. PubMed ID: 7014780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of antibody to rubella virus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Gravell M; Dorsett PH; Gutenson O; Ley AC
J Infect Dis; 1977 Oct; 136 Suppl():S300-3. PubMed ID: 561819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of different methods for assessment of rubella infection and immunity.
Braun R; Hornig C; Sann G; Doerr HW
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Sep; 252(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 6758420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of two passive agglutination procedures with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for rubella antibody status.
Pruneda RC; Dover JC
Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Dec; 86(6):768-70. PubMed ID: 3788864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Persistence of vaccine-induced immune responses to rubella: comparison with natural infection.
Horstmann DM; Schluederberg A; Emmons JE; Evans BK; Randolph MF; Andiman WA
Rev Infect Dis; 1985; 7 Suppl 1():S80-5. PubMed ID: 4001740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Determination of antibodies to rubella virus with the disperse dye immunoassay (DIA) in comparison with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Rothe U; Lasch J; Römer I; Sandow D; Hübner G; Rosmus K; Kiessig ST; Porstmann T
Biomed Biochim Acta; 1986; 45(10):1325-32. PubMed ID: 3566722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
