These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33850073)

  • 1. Assessment of Effectiveness of Erbium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser, GentleWave Irradiation, Photodynamic Therapy, and Sodium Hypochlorite in Smear Layer Removal.
    Dash S; Ismail PM; Singh J; Agwan MA; Ravikumar K; Annadurai T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1266-1269. PubMed ID: 33850073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet and diode lasers in smear layer removal and dentin permeability of root canal after biomechanical preparation - A scanning electron microscopy study.
    Dhawan S; Jasuja P; Khurana H; Gakhar E; Singh H
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2020; 38(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 32174631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal at the Apical One-Third of the Root Using Different Protocols of Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser.
    Habshi AY; Aga N; Habshi KY; Hassan MEM; Choudhry Z; Ahmed MA; Syed AUY; Jouhar R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Feb; 59(3):. PubMed ID: 36984434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of the Erbium:Yttrium aluminum garnet PIPS technique in comparison to different chemical solutions in removing the endodontic smear layer-an in vitro profilometric study.
    Nasher R; Franzen R; Gutknecht N
    Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Dec; 31(9):1871-1882. PubMed ID: 27778116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser in removing smear layer and debris with two different output powers.
    Bolhari B; Ehsani S; Etemadi A; Shafaq M; Nosrat A
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2014 Oct; 32(10):527-32. PubMed ID: 25198390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antibacterial and Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser Irradiation by Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming in Primary Molar Root Canals: A Preliminary Study.
    Korkut E; Torlak E; Gezgin O; Özer H; Şener Y
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Sep; 36(9):480-486. PubMed ID: 29905503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser.
    Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K
    Int Endod J; 1999 Jan; 32(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 10356467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Laser-Activated Irrigations on Smear Layer Removal from the Root Canal Wall.
    Wang X; Cheng X; Liu B; Liu X; Yu Q; He W
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2017 Dec; 35(12):688-694. PubMed ID: 28394240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Canal disinfection using Nd: YAG Laser, synchronized microbubble-photodynamic activation, and carbon quantum dots on microhardness, smear layer removal, and extrusion bond strength of zirconia post to canal dentin. An invitro scanning electron microscopic analysis.
    Alkhudhairy F
    Microsc Res Tech; 2024 Sep; 87(9):2043-2052. PubMed ID: 38646819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An
    Ismail PMS; AlMogbel AM; Priya R; Bansal N; Mattigatti S; Nara A; AlMutairi FJ
    Ann Afr Med; 2022; 21(3):244-249. PubMed ID: 36204910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic treatment: a help in removing smear layer.
    Guidotti R; Merigo E; Fornaini C; Rocca JP; Medioni E; Vescovi P
    Lasers Med Sci; 2014 Jan; 29(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 23212445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of microleakage of root canal fillings irradiated with different output powers of erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser.
    Özer SY; Basaran E
    Aust Endod J; 2013 Apr; 39(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 23551507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the antibacterial effect and smear layer removal using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming aided irrigation versus a conventional irrigation in single-rooted canals: an in vitro study.
    Zhu X; Yin X; Chang JW; Wang Y; Cheung GS; Zhang C
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2013 Aug; 31(8):371-7. PubMed ID: 23863104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrastructural evaluation of radicular dentin after Nd:YAG laser irradiation combined with different chemical substances.
    Faria MI; Souza-Gabriel AE; Marchesan MA; Sousa-Neto MD; Silva-Sousa YT
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 19014023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect on coronal leakage of liquid adhesive application over root fillings after smear layer removal with EDTA or Er:YAG laser.
    de Souza FD; Pécora JD; Silva RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jan; 99(1):125-8. PubMed ID: 15599360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation in Comparison with Different Irrigation Systems for Cleaning the Apical Root Canal Area Beyond Ledge.
    Aung NPS; Watanabe S; Okiji T
    Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2021 Dec; 39(12):759-765. PubMed ID: 34788578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation.
    Ahir B; Parekh V; Katyayan MK; Katyayan PA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.