These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33850211)

  • 1. Humans rely more on algorithms than social influence as a task becomes more difficult.
    Bogert E; Schecter A; Watson RT
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8028. PubMed ID: 33850211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human preferences toward algorithmic advice in a word association task.
    Bogert E; Lauharatanahirun N; Schecter A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):14501. PubMed ID: 36008508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural activity tracking identity and confidence in social information.
    Trudel N; Lockwood PL; Rushworth MFS; Wittmann MK
    Elife; 2023 Feb; 12():. PubMed ID: 36763582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence, advice seeking and changes of mind in decision making.
    Pescetelli N; Hauperich AK; Yeung N
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104810. PubMed ID: 34147712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the Inability to Ignore Useless Advice.
    Schultze T; Mojzisch A; Schulz-Hardt S
    Exp Psychol; 2017 May; 64(3):170-183. PubMed ID: 28633625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Feb; 116(7):2521-2526. PubMed ID: 30692252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How social information affects information search and choice in probabilistic inferences.
    Puskaric M; von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():166-176. PubMed ID: 29179021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. People Reject Algorithms in Uncertain Decision Domains Because They Have Diminishing Sensitivity to Forecasting Error.
    Dietvorst BJ; Bharti S
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1302-1314. PubMed ID: 32916083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.
    Pescetelli N; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Mar; 150(3):507-526. PubMed ID: 33001684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive reflection correlates with behavior on Twitter.
    Mosleh M; Pennycook G; Arechar AA; Rand DG
    Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):921. PubMed ID: 33568667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The roles of online and offline replay in planning.
    Eldar E; Lièvre G; Dayan P; Dolan RJ
    Elife; 2020 Jun; 9():. PubMed ID: 32553110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling the effects of advisor consensus and advice proximity.
    Wanzel SK; Schultze T; Schulz-Hardt S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1669-1675. PubMed ID: 28287767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inconsistent advice by ChatGPT influences decision making in various areas.
    Ikeda S
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):15876. PubMed ID: 38982276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Algorithm-based advice taking and clinical judgement: impact of advice distance and algorithm information.
    Pálfi B; Arora K; Kostopoulou O
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jul; 7(1):70. PubMed ID: 35895185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The hobgoblin of consistency: algorithmic judgment strategies underlie inflated self-assessments of performance.
    Williams EF; Dunning D; Kruger J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Jun; 104(6):976-94. PubMed ID: 23627747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Explainability does not mitigate the negative impact of incorrect AI advice in a personnel selection task.
    Cecil J; Lermer E; Hudecek MFC; Sauer J; Gaube S
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9736. PubMed ID: 38679619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating advice and experience: learning and decision making with social and nonsocial cues.
    Collins EC; Percy EJ; Smith ER; Kruschke JK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Jun; 100(6):967-82. PubMed ID: 21443371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic and Fast Encoding of Representational Uncertainty Underlies the Distortion of Relative Frequency.
    Ren X; Luo H; Zhang H
    J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(16):3692-3706. PubMed ID: 33674418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task conflict biases decision making.
    Schuch S; Dignath D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 May; 150(5):864-872. PubMed ID: 33001685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Collaborator's Reputation Can Bias Decisions and Anxiety under Uncertainty.
    Qi S; Footer O; Camerer CF; Mobbs D
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(9):2262-2269. PubMed ID: 29378862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.