These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33850644)

  • 21. The nature of residual cost in regular switch response factors.
    Milán EG; González A; Sanabria D; Pereda A; Hochel M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 16310155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hierarchical task organization in dual tasks: evidence for higher level task representations.
    Hirsch P; Nolden S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jul; 82(4):759-770. PubMed ID: 28285364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inhibition in task switching: The reliability of the n - 2 repetition cost.
    Kowalczyk AW; Grange JA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2419-2433. PubMed ID: 27653668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Task switching and action sequencing.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):526-40. PubMed ID: 16328435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Task-set switching deficits in early-stage Huntington's disease: implications for basal ganglia function.
    Aron AR; Watkins L; Sahakian BJ; Monsell S; Barker RA; Robbins TW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 12965037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 28752317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When predictions take control: the effect of task predictions on task switching performance.
    Duthoo W; De Baene W; Wühr P; Notebaert W
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():282. PubMed ID: 22891063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differential Preparation Intervals Modulate Repetition Processes in Task Switching: An ERP Study.
    Wang M; Yang P; Zhao QJ; Wang M; Jin Z; Li L
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():57. PubMed ID: 26924974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Disentangling stimulus and response compatibility as potential sources of backward crosstalk.
    Rieger T; Miller J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3415-3431. PubMed ID: 32529571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Crossmodal Effects in Task Switching: Modality Compatibility with Vocal and Pedal Responses.
    Stephan DN; Josten J; Friedgen E; Koch I
    J Cogn; 2021 Jan; 4(1):9. PubMed ID: 33554030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching: a diffusion model analysis.
    Kowalczyk AW; Grange JA
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):1965-1999. PubMed ID: 31177315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pre-stimulus EEG effects related to response speed, task switching and upcoming response hand.
    Gladwin TE; Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 16169147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exogenous influences on task set activation in task switching.
    Rubin O; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1033-46. PubMed ID: 16885142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dimensional weighting and task switching following frontal lobe damage: Fractionating the task switching deficit.
    Kumada T; Humphreys GW
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2006 May; 23(3):424-47. PubMed ID: 21049338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter?
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Szmalec A; Vandierendonck A
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 15850159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determining the scope of control underlying the congruency sequence effect: roles of stimulus-response mapping and response mode.
    Lim CE; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():267-276. PubMed ID: 30170247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of Acute Aerobic Exercise on Cognitive Flexibility Required During Task-Switching Paradigm.
    Bae S; Masaki H
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():260. PubMed ID: 31417381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.