These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33850787)

  • 21. Evolution, controversies and the future of prostate cancer grading.
    Egevad L; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Samaratunga H
    Pathol Int; 2019 Feb; 69(2):55-66. PubMed ID: 30694570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].
    Kristiansen G; Egevad L; Amin M; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA; Epstein JI;
    Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26809207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gleason grading: past, present and future.
    Delahunt B; Miller RJ; Srigley JR; Evans AJ; Samaratunga H
    Histopathology; 2012 Jan; 60(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22212079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern in the contemporary era of Gleason grade grouping: A narrative review.
    Taguchi S; Morikawa T; Shibahara J; Fukuhara H
    Int J Urol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):614-621. PubMed ID: 33580599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The validation of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for patients with high-risk prostate cancer: a single-center retrospective study.
    Liu J; Zhao J; Zhang M; Chen N; Sun G; Yang Y; Zhang X; Chen J; Shen P; Shi M; Zeng H
    Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():6521-6529. PubMed ID: 31372053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Head to head: should the intraductal component of invasive prostate cancer be graded?
    Varma M; Epstein JI
    Histopathology; 2021 Jan; 78(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 32692448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prostate cancer grading in 2018: limitations, implementations, cribriform morphology, and biological markers.
    Montironi R; Cimadamore A; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Scarpelli M
    Int J Biol Markers; 2018 Nov; 33(4):331-334. PubMed ID: 29945478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimization of the 2014 Gleason grade grouping in a Canadian cohort of patients with localized prostate cancer.
    Wissing M; Brimo F; Chevalier S; Scarlata E; McKercher G; O'Flaherty A; Aprikian S; Thibodeau V; Saad F; Carmel M; Lacombe L; Têtu B; Ekindi-Ndongo N; Latour M; Trudel D; Aprikian A
    BJU Int; 2019 Apr; 123(4):624-631. PubMed ID: 30113732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.
    Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Gianduzzo T; Coughlin G; Duffy D; LeFevre I; Johannsen S; Egevad L; Yaxley J
    Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 26325670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists.
    Berney DM; Algaba F; Camparo P; Compérat E; Griffiths D; Kristiansen G; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Varma M; Egevad L
    Histopathology; 2014 Feb; 64(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 24102975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Impact of International Association of Urological Pathology Gleason scoring system on prostatic carcinoma grading: a preliminary analysis of 185 cases].
    Wang G; Shen D
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 43(10):677-9. PubMed ID: 25567594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 international society of urological pathology modified Gleason grading system.
    Dong F; Wang C; Farris AB; Wu S; Lee H; Olumi AF; McDougal WS; Young RH; Wu CL
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):838-43. PubMed ID: 22592143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading for prostatic adenocarcinoma in thin core biopsies using TROG 03.04 'RADAR' trial clinical data.
    Delahunt B; Egevad L; Srigley JR; Steigler A; Murray JD; Atkinson C; Matthews J; Duchesne G; Spry NA; Christie D; Joseph D; Attia J; Denham JW
    Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 26325671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
    Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
    Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contemporary prognostic indicators for prostate cancer incorporating International Society of Urological Pathology recommendations.
    Egevad L; Delahunt B; Kristiansen G; Samaratunga H; Varma M
    Pathology; 2018 Jan; 50(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 29199015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in the prostate: report from the International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus conference.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Humphrey PA; Montironi R;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):e6-e19. PubMed ID: 25029122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prostate cancer glands with cribriform architecture and with glomeruloid features should be considered as Gleason pattern 4 and not pattern 3.
    Minardi D; Mazzucchelli R; Scarpelli M; Massari F; Ciccarese C; Lopez-Beltran A; Cheng L; Montironi R
    Future Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(12):1431-3. PubMed ID: 27189718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    van Leenders GJLH; van der Kwast TH; Grignon DJ; Evans AJ; Kristiansen G; Kweldam CF; Litjens G; McKenney JK; Melamed J; Mottet N; Paner GP; Samaratunga H; Schoots IG; Simko JP; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Warren AY; Wheeler TM; Williamson SR; Iczkowski KA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Aug; 44(8):e87-e99. PubMed ID: 32459716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The evolving Gleason grading system.
    Chen N; Zhou Q
    Chin J Cancer Res; 2016 Feb; 28(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 27041927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.