133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33850970)
1. Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers.
Suryavanshi S; Kumar J; Manchanda A; Singh I; Khurana N
Eur J Radiol Open; 2021; 8():100339. PubMed ID: 33850970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Squamous cell cancer of hypopharynx and larynx - evaluation of metastatic nodal disease based on computed tomography perfusion studies.
Trojanowska A; Trojanowski P; Bisdas S; Staśkiewicz G; Drop A; Klatka J; Bobek-Billewicz B
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):1034-9. PubMed ID: 21324623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic value of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous carcinoma by using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography perfusion.
Zhong J; Lu Z; Xu L; Dong L; Qiao H; Hua R; Gong Y; Liu Z; Hao C; Liu X; Zong C; He L; Liu J
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():260859. PubMed ID: 25050333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cervical lymph nodes with CT perfusion in patients with hypopharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell cancer.
Trojanowski P; Klatka J; Trojanowska A; Jargiełło T; Drop A
Pol J Radiol; 2011 Jan; 76(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 22802810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Role of PET-CT in Evaluation of Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinomas.
Çaylaklı F; Yılmaz S; Özer C; Reyhan M
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jun; 53(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 29391983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relative value of ultrasound, computed tomography and positron emission tomography imaging in the clinically node-negative neck in oral cancer.
Chaukar D; Dandekar M; Kane S; Arya S; Purandare N; Rangarajan V; Deshmukh A; Pai P; Chaturvedi P; D'Cruz A
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(2):e332-8. PubMed ID: 25131685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
Ding Z; Deng C; Wang Z; Liu L; Ma X; Huang J; Wang X; Xuan M; Xie H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Mar; 50(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 32739248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Rodrigues RS; Bozza FA; Christian PE; Hoffman JM; Butterfield RI; Christensen CR; Heilbrun M; Wiggins RH; Hunt JP; Bentz BG; Hitchcock YJ; Morton KA
J Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 50(8):1205-13. PubMed ID: 19617339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Performance of Adaptive 4D Volume Perfusion CT for Detecting Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Matoba M; Tsuji H; Shimode Y; Nagata H; Tonami H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1106-1111. PubMed ID: 30240295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced CT and MRI for detecting neck metastasis of oral cancer: comparison between analyses performed by oral and medical radiologists.
de Souza Figueiredo PT; Leite AF; Barra FR; Dos Anjos RF; Freitas AC; Nascimento LA; Melo NS; Guerra EN
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jul; 41(5):396-404. PubMed ID: 22241874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of (11)C-choline PET/CT in preoperative lymph node staging of bladder cancer: a systematic comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and histologic findings.
Brunocilla E; Ceci F; Schiavina R; Castellucci P; Maffione AM; Cevenini M; Bianchi L; Borghesi M; Giunchi F; Fiorentino M; Chondrogiannis S; Colletti PM; Rubello D; Fanti S; Martorana G
Clin Nucl Med; 2014 May; 39(5):e308-12. PubMed ID: 24458183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic ability of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for metastatic cervical nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: significance of additional coronal reconstruction images.
Ando T; Kato H; Kawaguchi M; Tanahashi Y; Aoki M; Kuze B; Matsuo M
Pol J Radiol; 2020; 85():e1-e7. PubMed ID: 32180847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study of Clinical, FNAC, Ultra Sonography and Computed Tomography with Post Operative Histopathology.
Hallur N; Sathar R; Siddiqua A; Zakaullah S; Kothari C
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Dec; 74(Suppl 3):5921-5926. PubMed ID: 36742803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of FDG PET/Contrast-Enhanced CT in Initial Staging of Colorectal Cancer - Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT.
Kunawudhi A; Sereeborwornthanasak K; Promteangtrong C; Siripongpreeda B; Vanprom S; Chotipanich C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(8):4071-5. PubMed ID: 27644663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of 18-F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomographic/Computed Tomographic Imaging in Primary Staging of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity.
Linz C; Brands RC; Herterich T; Hartmann S; Müller-Richter U; Kübler AC; Haug L; Kertels O; Bley TA; Dierks A; Buck AK; Lapa C; Brumberg J
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e217083. PubMed ID: 33881529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Comparison of Computed Tomography Perfusion, Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for the Detection of Primary Esophageal Carcinoma.
Genc B; Kantarci M; Sade R; Orsal E; Ogul H; Okur A; Aydin Y; Karaca L; Eroğlu A
Med Princ Pract; 2016; 25(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 26784024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volumetric CT perfusion assessment of treatment response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Comparison of CT perfusion parameters before and after chemoradiation therapy.
Rana L; Sharma S; Sood S; Singh B; Gupta MK; Minhas RS; Jhobta A; Bhatia V; Venkat B
Eur J Radiol Open; 2015; 2():46-54. PubMed ID: 26937435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT as a post-treatment tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT.
Suenaga Y; Kitajima K; Ishihara T; Sasaki R; Otsuki N; Nibu K; Minamikawa T; Kiyota N; Sugimura K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 26188656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of PET/CT with conventional imaging modalities (USG, CECT) in evaluation of N0 neck in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Chauhan A; Kulshrestha P; Kapoor S; Singh H; Jacob MJ; Patel M; Ganguly M
Med J Armed Forces India; 2012 Oct; 68(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 24532898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of sonography and CT for differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Sumi M; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 11264102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
