BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33851489)

  • 21. Research governance authorisation: the next frontier.
    Hollingworth S; Mckavanagh D; McPherson I; Walpole E; Yu SY
    Aust Health Rev; 2021 Jun; 45(3):389-392. PubMed ID: 33503401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence from UK Research Ethics Committee members on what makes a good research ethics review, and what can be improved.
    Sidaway M; Collett C; Kolstoe SE
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288083. PubMed ID: 37399215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reviewing the reviewers: a survey of institutional ethics committees in Australia.
    McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW
    Med J Aust; 1990 Mar; 152(6):289-96. PubMed ID: 2314331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Research Evaluation Alongside Clinical Treatment in COVID-19 (REACT COVID-19): an observational and biobanking study.
    Burke H; Freeman A; Dushianthan A; Celinski M; Batchelor J; Phan H; Borca F; Kipps C; Thomas GJ; Faust SN; Sheard N; Williams S; Fitzpatrick P; Landers D; Wilkinson T
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jan; 11(1):e043012. PubMed ID: 33483446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees.
    Ahmed AH; Nicholson KG
    J Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; 22(5):263-6. PubMed ID: 8910776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do Australian researchers accept committee review and conduct ethical research?
    McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW
    Soc Sci Med; 1992 Aug; 35(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 1519084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Local Research Ethics Committees can audit ethical standards in research.
    Berry J
    J Med Ethics; 1997 Dec; 23(6):379-81. PubMed ID: 9451608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identification of ethics committees based on authors' disclosures: cross-sectional study of articles published in the European Journal of Anaesthesiology and a survey of ethics committees.
    Zoccatelli D; Tramèr MR; Elia N
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 29884170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. IRBs During COVID-19: Tried and True.
    McMillan G
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2021; 11(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 34334482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Research on human subjects: Australian ethics committees take tentative steps.
    Osborne LW
    J Med Ethics; 1983 Jun; 9(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 6876099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hospital ethics approval for a population-based case-control study of very preterm birth.
    Watson LF; Rayner JA; Lumley JM
    Aust Health Rev; 2007 Nov; 31(4):514-22. PubMed ID: 17973608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.
    Petrova M; Barclay S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 30678668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Revising the legislation of Ethics Committees to ease biomedical research in humans across the world: lessons from the COVID-19 emergency.
    Vinceti SR; Filippini T
    Acta Biomed; 2022 May; 93(2):e2021579. PubMed ID: 35546005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethical review of COVID-19 research in the Netherlands; a mixed-method evaluation among medical research ethics committees and investigators.
    IJkema R; Janssens MJPA; van der Post JAM; Licht CM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0255040. PubMed ID: 34297752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Guidelines for local research ethics committees: distinguishing between patient and population research in the Multicentre Research Project.
    Benster R; Pollock AM
    Public Health; 1993 Jan; 107(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 8475241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.
    Tully J; Ninis N; Booy R; Viner R
    BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10784541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Have centralised ethics and governance applications improved the time-variable, and approval process to conduct research in Victorian hospitals?
    Baguley BJ; Jefford M; Aly A; Cashin P; White V
    Intern Med J; 2019 Jun; 49(6):807-808. PubMed ID: 31185521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An evaluation of a data linkage training workshop for research ethics committees.
    Tan KM; Flack FS; Bear NL; Allen JA
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 16():13. PubMed ID: 25888741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medical research. Mandatory ethics recommendations.
    Sarma V
    Nature; 1983 Jan; 301(5896):103. PubMed ID: 6823286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.