129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33851489)
41. Clinical trials with cannabis medicines-guidance for ethics committees, governance officers and researchers to streamline ethics applications and ensuring patient safety: considerations from the Australian experience.
Martin JH; Hill C; Walsh A; Efron D; Taylor K; Kennedy M; Galettis R; Lightfoot P; Hanson J; Irving H; Agar M; Lacey J
Trials; 2020 Nov; 21(1):932. PubMed ID: 33203469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.
Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Jul; 7(3):38-49. PubMed ID: 22850142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Authorising the Release of Data without Consent for Health Research: The Role of Data Custodians and HRECs in Australia.
Flack F; Adams C; Allen J
J Law Med; 2019 Apr; 26(3):655-680. PubMed ID: 30958656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. National Guidelines for Ethics Committees Reviewing Biomedical & Health Research during COVID-19 Pandemic: An analysis.
Arunachalam MA; Halwai A; Arunachalam C
Indian J Med Ethics; 2021; VI(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34080993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Research on COVID-19: Stories from IRB Members, Research Administrators & Investigators.
Iltis AS; McMillan G
Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2021; 11(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 34334454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Ethics creep or governance creep? Challenges for Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECS).
Gorman SM
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2011 Sep; 29(4):14.1-16. PubMed ID: 22397089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Applying for ethical approval for research: the main issues.
Gelling L
Nurs Stand; 2016 Jan; 30(20):40-4. PubMed ID: 26758167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of clinical trials by Ethics Committees in Germany: experience of applicants with the review of requests for opinion of the Ethics Committees - results of a survey among members of the German Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (VFA).
Russ H; Busta S; Riedel A; Zöllner G; Jost B
Ger Med Sci; 2009 Jul; 7():Doc07. PubMed ID: 19675747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Review by a local medical research ethics committee of the conduct of approved research projects, by examination of patients' case notes, consent forms, and research records and by interview.
Smith T; Moore EJ; Tunstall-Pedoe H
BMJ; 1997 May; 314(7094):1588-90. PubMed ID: 9169403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Ethical procedures and patient consent differ in Europe.
Stamer UM; Naef N; Porz R; Stuber F; Leva B; Meissner W; Fletcher D;
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Feb; 32(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 25503525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey.
Crosby S; Malavisi A; Huang L; Jan S; Holden R; Neal B
Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):779. PubMed ID: 38041126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The difficulties and costs of ethical assessment of a national research project.
Dockerty JD; Elwood M
N Z Med J; 1992 Aug; 105(939):311-3. PubMed ID: 1501815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. How do general practices respond to a pandemic? Protocol for a prospective qualitative study of six Australian practices.
Russell G; Advocat J; Lane R; Neil J; Staunton-Smith T; Alexander KE; Hattle S; Crabtree BF; Miller WL; Setunge SN; Sturgiss EA
BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e046086. PubMed ID: 34521660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Ethics of Using News Stories concerning Minors as Empirical Material in Health Research: Reflections on a Swedish Case.
Stjernswärd S; Tilgmann C; Glasdam S
Ethics Hum Res; 2024; 46(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 38240397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Serial measurements in COVID-19-induced acute respiratory disease to unravel heterogeneity of the disease course: design of the Maastricht Intensive Care COVID cohort (MaastrICCht).
Tas J; van Gassel RJJ; Heines SJH; Mulder MMG; Heijnen NFL; Acampo-de Jong MJ; Bels JLM; Bennis FC; Koelmann M; Groven RVM; Donkers MA; van Rosmalen F; Hermans BJM; Meex SJ; Mingels A; Bekers O; Savelkoul P; Oude Lashof AML; Wildberger J; Tijssen FH; Buhre W; Sels JEM; Ghossein-Doha C; Driessen RGH; Kubben PL; Janssen MLF; Nicolaes GAF; Strauch U; Geyik Z; Delnoij TSR; Walraven KHM; Stehouwer CD; Verbunt JAMCF; Van Mook WNKA; van Santen S; Schnabel RM; Aries MJH; van de Poll MCG; Bergmans D; van der Horst ICC; van Kuijk S; van Bussel BCT
BMJ Open; 2020 Sep; 10(9):e040175. PubMed ID: 32994259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Ethics decision-making in Australian hospitals.
McNeill PM; Walters JD; Webster IW
Med J Aust; 1994 Oct; 161(8):487-8. PubMed ID: 7935122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Out of the frying pan? Streamlining the ethics review process of multisite qualitative research projects.
Iedema RA; Allen S; Britton K; Hor S
Aust Health Rev; 2013 May; 37(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 23257167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. "No Country Bureaucratised its way to Excellence": A Content Analysis of Comments on a Petition to Streamline Australian Research Ethics and Governance Processes.
Scott AM; Bryant EA; Byrne JA; Taylor N; Barnett AG
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2022; 17(1-2):102-113. PubMed ID: 34636706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Ethics of research involving humans: uniform processes for disparate categories?
Parker M; Holt J; Turner G; Broerse J
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Jul; 22(3):50-65. PubMed ID: 14682320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Research governance: new hope for ethics committees?
Frew D; Martlew A
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2007; 26(1-2):17-23. PubMed ID: 17867319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
