BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2995 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33852886)

  • 1. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
    Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HPV testing with cytology triage for cervical cancer screening in routine practice.
    Louvanto K; Chevarie-Davis M; Ramanakumar AV; Franco EL; Ferenczy A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 210(5):474.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24373948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
    Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
    PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
    Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
    Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
    Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
    Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
    Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
    Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
    JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Triaging HPV-positive women with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: Results from a sub-study nested into the ATHENA trial.
    Wright TC; Behrens CM; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Sharma A; Stoler MH; Ridder R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 144(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 28094038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing: a pooled analysis using the data from 13 population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.
    Pan QJ; Hu SY; Guo HQ; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Chen W; Cao J; Jiang Y; Zhao FH; Qiao YL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24631450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
    Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of different strategies for the triage to colposcopy of women tested high-risk HPV positive on self-collected cervicovaginal samples.
    Chatzistamatiou K; Tsertanidou A; Moysiadis T; Mouchtaropoulou E; Pasentsis K; Skenderi A; Stamatopoulos K; Agorastos T
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 162(3):560-568. PubMed ID: 34210517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.
    Torres-Ibarra L; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT; Spiegelman D; Lazcano-Ponce E; Franco EL; Moscicki AB; Mahmud SM; Wheeler CM; Rivera-Paredez B; Hernández-López R; León-Maldonado L; Salmerón J;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915781. PubMed ID: 31747033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56-60.
    Lamin H; Eklund C; Elfström KM; Carlsten-Thor A; Hortlund M; Elfgren K; Törnberg S; Dillner J
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014788. PubMed ID: 28566363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Onclarity Human Papillomavirus Trial: Design, methods, and baseline results.
    Stoler MH; Wright TC; Parvu V; Vaughan L; Yanson K; Eckert K; Karchmer T; Kodsi S; Cooper CK
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 29681462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT.
    Gilham C; Sargent A; Kitchener HC; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(28):1-44. PubMed ID: 31219027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 150.