These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33853189)

  • 1. Establishing Prediction Intervals for the SpeedWheel Acuity Test in Adults and Children.
    Luethy ML; Schötzau A; Palmowski-Wolfe A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2021 Apr; 238(4):488-492. PubMed ID: 33853189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective measurement of visual acuity by optokinetic nystagmus suppression in children and adult patients.
    Schwob N; Palmowski-Wolfe A
    J AAPOS; 2019 Oct; 23(5):272.e1-272.e6. PubMed ID: 31526857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Freiburg Acuity Test in Preschool Children: Testability, Test-Retest Variability, and Comparison With LEA Symbols.
    Farassat N; Jehle V; Heinrich SP; Lagrèze WA; Bach M
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 13(3):14. PubMed ID: 38502142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Establishing an Objective Measurement of Visual Acuity with a Computerised Optokinetic Nystagmus Suppression Test.
    Schwob N; Palmowski-Wolfe A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2020 Apr; 237(4):502-505. PubMed ID: 32330979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment: overestimation in amblyopia.
    Wenner Y; Heinrich SP; Beisse C; Fuchs A; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 128(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 24623357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].
    Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Oct; 228(10):864-7. PubMed ID: 21997822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].
    Becker R; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16418930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resolving the clinical acuity categories "hand motion" and "counting fingers" using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT).
    Lange C; Feltgen N; Junker B; Schulze-Bonsel K; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 247(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 18766368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of two visual acuity tests in school enrolment examinations : Tumbling E test versus Freiburg visual acuity test].
    Bach M; Reuter M; Lagrèze WA
    Ophthalmologe; 2016 Aug; 113(8):684-9. PubMed ID: 27048550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test.
    Schulze-Bonsel K; Feltgen N; Burau H; Hansen L; Bach M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1236-40. PubMed ID: 16505064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Acuity and Ophthalmic Outcomes in the Year After Cataract Surgery Among Children Younger Than 13 Years.
    ; Repka MX; Dean TW; Kraker RT; Bothun ED; Morrison DG; Lambert SR; Stahl ED; Wallace DK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 137(7):817-824. PubMed ID: 31095258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of visual acuity measurements via three different methods in preschool children: Lea symbols, crowded Lea symbols, Snellen E chart.
    Inal A; Ocak OB; Aygit ED; Yilmaz I; Inal B; Taskapili M; Gokyigit B
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 28639088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A reassessment and comparison of the Landolt C and tumbling E charts in managing amblyopia.
    Lai YH; Wu HJ; Chang SJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):18277. PubMed ID: 34521954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Randomized Crossover Study to Assess the Usability of Two New Vision Tests in Patients with Low Vision.
    Jolly JK; Gray JM; Salvetti AP; Han RC; MacLaren RE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):443-452. PubMed ID: 31058709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random measurement error in visual acuity measurement in clinical settings.
    Leinonen J; Laakkonen E; Laatikainen L
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Jun; 83(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 15948786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modified Allen pictures to assess amblyopia in young children.
    Mayer DL; Gross RD
    Ophthalmology; 1990 Jun; 97(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 2374689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison.
    O'Boyle C; Chen SI; Little JA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):457-461. PubMed ID: 27388249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.
    Plainis S; Kontadakis G; Feloni E; Giannakopoulou T; Tsilimbaris MK; Pallikaris IG; Moschandreas J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 23314130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term changes in visual acuity and refractive error in amblyopes.
    Rutstein RP; Corliss DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jul; 81(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 15252350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.