237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33853794)
21. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Hol L; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M; van Vuuren AJ; van Dekken H; Reijerink JC; van der Togt AC; Habbema JD; Kuipers EJ
Gut; 2010 Jan; 59(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19671542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?
van Dam L; Korfage IJ; Kuipers EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Ballegooijen M; van Leerdam ME
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 49(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 23571149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Randomized controlled trial: Flexible sigmoidoscopy as an adjunct to faecal occult blood testing in population screening.
Steele RJ; Carey FA; Stanners G; Lang J; Brand J; Brownlee LA; Crichton EM; Winter JW; Phull PS; Mowat C; Strachan JA; Digan AM; Fraser CG
J Med Screen; 2020 Jun; 27(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 31690179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Colorectal cancer screening.
Bretthauer M
J Intern Med; 2011 Aug; 270(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 21575082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prevention of colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness approach to a screening model employing sigmoidoscopy.
Norum J
Ann Oncol; 1998 Jun; 9(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 9681074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.
Vernon SW
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Oct; 89(19):1406-22. PubMed ID: 9326910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Jodal HC; Helsingen LM; Anderson JC; Lytvyn L; Vandvik PO; Emilsson L
BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e032773. PubMed ID: 31578199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evidence for colorectal cancer screening.
Bretthauer M
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 20833346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy: 2004 survey.
Zorzi M; Grazzini G; Senore C; Vettorazzi M
Epidemiol Prev; 2006; 30(1 Suppl 3):41-50. PubMed ID: 16937845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validation of Microsimulation Models against Alternative Model Predictions and Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Lew JB; Greuter MJE; Caruana M; He E; Worthington J; St John DJ; Macrae FA; Feletto E; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
Med Decis Making; 2020 Aug; 40(6):815-829. PubMed ID: 32845232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Screening and primary prevention of colorectal cancer: a review of sex-specific and site-specific differences.
Massat NJ; Moss SM; Halloran SP; Duffy SW
J Med Screen; 2013; 20(3):125-48. PubMed ID: 24197771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy.
Winawer SJ; Flehinger BJ; Schottenfeld D; Miller DG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Aug; 85(16):1311-8. PubMed ID: 8340943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of the rising colorectal cancer incidence in young adults on the optimal age to start screening: Microsimulation analysis I to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline.
Peterse EFP; Meester RGS; Siegel RL; Chen JC; Dwyer A; Ahnen DJ; Smith RA; Zauber AG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
Cancer; 2018 Jul; 124(14):2964-2973. PubMed ID: 29846933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
Barzi A; Lenz HJ; Quinn DI; Sadeghi S
Cancer; 2017 May; 123(9):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28117881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Systematic review of the effectiveness of population screening for colorectal cancer.
Kerr J; Day P; Broadstock M; Weir R; Bidwell S
N Z Med J; 2007 Jul; 120(1258):U2629. PubMed ID: 17653247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
Autier P; Boniol M
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Flexible sigmoidoscopy following a positive faecal occult blood test within a bowel screening programme may reduce the detection of neoplasia.
Mansouri D; McMillan DC; Roxburgh CS; Moug SJ; Crighton EM; Horgan PG
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Nov; 15(11):1375-81. PubMed ID: 23927751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials.
Holme Ø; Schoen RE; Senore C; Segnan N; Hoff G; Løberg M; Bretthauer M; Adami HO; Kalager M
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6673. PubMed ID: 28087510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is the type of test used for mass colorectal cancer screening a determinant of compliance? A cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing fecal occult blood testing with flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Federici A; Marinacci C; Mangia M; Borgia P; Giorgi Rossi P; Guasticchi G
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 16965874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
