These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33855054)

  • 1. Are Marbling and the Prediction of Beef Eating Quality Affected by Different Grading Sites?
    Liu J; Pogorzelski G; Neveu A; Legrand I; Pethick D; Ellies-Oury MP; Hocquette JF
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():611153. PubMed ID: 33855054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Meat Standards Australia carcass grading site affects assessment of marbling and prediction of meat-eating quality in growing European beef cattle.
    Santinello M; Rampado N; Penasa M; Hocquette JF; Pethick D; De Marchi M
    Meat Sci; 2024 Jul; 213():109501. PubMed ID: 38574653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships between European carcass evaluation and Meat Standards Australia grading scheme applied to young beef cattle.
    Santinello M; Penasa M; Goi A; Rampado N; Hocquette JF; De Marchi M
    Meat Sci; 2024 Oct; 216():109575. PubMed ID: 38943842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.
    Bonny SP; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Farmer LJ; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 26750424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of consumer palatability in beef using visual marbling scores and chemical intramuscular fat percentage.
    Stewart SM; Gardner GE; McGilchrist P; Pethick DW; Polkinghorne R; Thompson JM; Tarr G
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108322. PubMed ID: 33067083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does a single adjustment in the meat standards Australia beef grading model cater for different hormonal growth promotant formulations?
    Packer DT; McGilchrist P; Polkinghorne RJ; Ball AJ; Thompson JM
    Animal; 2021 May; 15(5):100196. PubMed ID: 34029795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between visual marbling score and chemical intramuscular fat with camera marbling percentage in Australian beef carcasses.
    Stewart SM; Gardner GE; Williams A; Pethick DW; McGilchrist P; Kuchida K
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108369. PubMed ID: 33261986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Across countries implementation of handheld near-infrared spectrometer for the on-line prediction of beef marbling in slaughterhouse.
    Kombolo-Ngah M; Goi A; Santinello M; Rampado N; Atanassova S; Liu J; Faure P; Thoumy L; Neveu A; Andueza D; De Marchi M; Hocquette JF
    Meat Sci; 2023 Jun; 200():109169. PubMed ID: 37001445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computed tomography has improved precision for prediction of intramuscular fat percent in the M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum in cattle compared to manual grading.
    Anderson F; Cook J; Williams A; Gardner GE
    Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():425-430. PubMed ID: 30055434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality.
    McGilchrist P; Polkinghorne RJ; Ball AJ; Thompson JM
    Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1750-1757. PubMed ID: 30724139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing marbling scores of beef at the 10th rib vs. 12th rib of longissimus thoracis in the slaughter line using camera grading technology in Germany.
    Schulz L; Sundrum A
    Meat Sci; 2019 Jun; 152():116-120. PubMed ID: 30844621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective grading of rib eye traits using the Q-FOM™ camera in Australian beef carcasses.
    Stewart SM; Toft H; O'Reilly RA; Lauridsen T; Esberg J; Jørgensen TB; Tarr G; Christensen M
    Meat Sci; 2024 Jul; 213():109500. PubMed ID: 38582006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmarking carcass characteristics and muscles from commercially identified beef and dairy cull cow carcasses for Warner-Bratzler shear force and sensory attributes.
    Stelzleni AM; Patten LE; Johnson DD; Calkins CR; Gwartney BL
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2631-8. PubMed ID: 17565055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adding value to beef portion steaks through measuring individual marbling.
    Pannier L; van de Weijer TM; van der Steen FTHJ; Kranenbarg R; Gardner GE
    Meat Sci; 2023 Oct; 204():109279. PubMed ID: 37467681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship of physiological maturity and marbling judged according to Korean grading system to meat quality traits of Hanwoo beef females.
    Moon SS; Yang HS; Park GB; Joo ST
    Meat Sci; 2006 Nov; 74(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 22063056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review: The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction.
    Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2434-2442. PubMed ID: 29606159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. French consumer evaluation of eating quality of Angus x Salers beef: Effects of muscle cut, muscle slicing and ageing.
    Liu J; Pannier L; Ellies-Oury MP; Legrand I; Noel F; Sepchat B; Prache S; Pethick D; Hocquette JF
    Meat Sci; 2023 Mar; 197():109079. PubMed ID: 36563497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective grading of eye muscle area, intramuscular fat and marbling in Australian beef and lamb.
    Stewart SM; Lauridsen T; Toft H; Pethick DW; Gardner GE; McGilchrist P; Christensen M
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108358. PubMed ID: 33160745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability.
    Hocquette JF; Van Wezemael L; Chriki S; Legrand I; Verbeke W; Farmer L; Scollan ND; Polkinghorne R; Rødbotten R; Allen P; Pethick DW
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 24035246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of fat percentage within marbling score on beef longissimus muscle using 3 different fat determination methods.
    Dow DL; Wiegand BR; Ellersieck MR; Lorenzen CL
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Apr; 89(4):1173-9. PubMed ID: 21112980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.