These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33855599)
1. A proposal to modify the 8th edition of the UICC staging system for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Matsumoto T; Okabayashi T; Sui K; Kimura J; Morita S; Iwata J; Iiyama T; Kubota K; Shimada Y Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):667-677. PubMed ID: 33855599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. pT but not pN stage of the 8th TNM classification significantly improves prognostication in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Schlitter AM; Jesinghaus M; Jäger C; Konukiewitz B; Muckenhuber A; Demir IE; Bahra M; Denkert C; Friess H; Kloeppel G; Ceyhan GO; Weichert W Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():121-129. PubMed ID: 28802189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Shin DW; Lee JC; Kim J; Woo SM; Lee WJ; Han SS; Park SJ; Choi KS; Cha HS; Yoon YS; Han HS; Hong EK; Hwang JH Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2159-2165. PubMed ID: 31202572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition, for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Kassardjian A; Stanzione N; Donahue TR; Wainberg ZA; Damato L; Wang HL Pancreas; 2019 Aug; 48(7):876-882. PubMed ID: 31268985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation. Fang C; Wang W; Deng JY; Sun Z; Seeruttun SR; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Liang H; Zhou ZW Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Nov; 38(1):67. PubMed ID: 30454049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-institutional Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) Changes for T and N Staging in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Allen PJ; Kuk D; Castillo CF; Basturk O; Wolfgang CL; Cameron JL; Lillemoe KD; Ferrone CR; Morales-Oyarvide V; He J; Weiss MJ; Hruban RH; Gönen M; Klimstra DS; Mino-Kenudson M Ann Surg; 2017 Jan; 265(1):185-191. PubMed ID: 27163957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer. van Roessel S; Kasumova GG; Verheij J; Najarian RM; Maggino L; de Pastena M; Malleo G; Marchegiani G; Salvia R; Ng SC; de Geus SW; Lof S; Giovinazzo F; van Dam JL; Kent TS; Busch OR; van Eijck CH; Koerkamp BG; Abu Hilal M; Bassi C; Tseng JF; Besselink MG JAMA Surg; 2018 Dec; 153(12):e183617. PubMed ID: 30285076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Refined prognostic staging for resected pancreatic cancer by modified stage grouping and addition of tumour grade. König AK; Gros H; Hinz U; Hank T; Kaiser J; Hackert T; Bergmann F; Büchler MW; Strobel O Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 34344573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Comparative Analysis Between the 7th and 8th Versions of the AJCC/UICC Staging System Based on the SEER Database. Yang F; Zhong Q; Huang Z; Lian M; Fang J Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2019; 10():10. PubMed ID: 30733707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Equipping the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with tumor grade: a recursive partitioning analysis. Chen YT; Huang ZP; Zhou ZW; He MM Med Oncol; 2016 Nov; 33(11):122. PubMed ID: 27730526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multinational validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition pancreatic cancer staging system in a pancreas head cancer cohort. Kwon W; He J; Higuchi R; Son D; Lee SY; Kim J; Kim H; Kim SW; Wolfgang CL; Cameron JL; Yamamoto M; Jang JY J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2018 Sep; 25(9):418-427. PubMed ID: 30118171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma is Spread to the Peripancreatic Soft Tissue in the Majority of Resected Cases, Rendering the AJCC T-Stage Protocol (7th Edition) Inapplicable and Insignificant: A Size-Based Staging System (pT1: ≤2, pT2: >2-≤4, pT3: >4 cm) is More Valid and Clinically Relevant. Saka B; Balci S; Basturk O; Bagci P; Postlewait LM; Maithel S; Knight J; El-Rayes B; Kooby D; Sarmiento J; Muraki T; Oliva I; Bandyopadhyay S; Akkas G; Goodman M; Reid MD; Krasinskas A; Everett R; Adsay V Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):2010-8. PubMed ID: 26832882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gross tumor size using the AJCC 8th ed. T staging criteria does not provide prognostic stratification for neoadjuvant treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Rowan DJ; Hartley CP; Aldakkak M; Christians KK; Evans DB; Tsai S; Hagen CE Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Jun; 46():151485. PubMed ID: 32172219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AJCC 7th edition staging classification is more applicable than AJCC 8th edition staging classification for invasive IPMN. Fan Z; Cheng H; Jin K; Gong Y; Huang Q; Xu J; Ni Q; Yu X; Liu C; Luo G World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Aug; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 31387646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the seventh and eighth editions of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: analysis of 1317 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy at two centers. Yang XL; Wang Y; Liang SB; He SS; Chen DM; Chen HY; Lu LX; Chen Y BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):606. PubMed ID: 29843648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The applicability of new TNM classification for humanpapilloma virus-related oropharyngeal cancer in the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system in Japan: A single-centre study. Sano D; Yabuki K; Arai Y; Tanabe T; Chiba Y; Nishimura G; Takahashi H; Yamanaka S; Oridate N Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):558-565. PubMed ID: 28760331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the 8th AJCC staging system for pathologically versus clinically staged pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A time to revisit a dogma? Abdel-Rahman O Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2018 Feb; 17(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 29428107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of the predictive value of the sixth and seventh edition TNM pT classifications in prognosis for gastric cancer]. Zhang P; Xu Y; Guo J; Xu H Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 37(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 25975787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new AJCC 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; a need to subclassify stage III? Song M; Yoon SB; Lee IS; Hong TH; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Lee MA; Jung ES; Choi MG Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():62-69. PubMed ID: 30326370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diversity between curatively resected pancreatic head and body-tail cancers based on the 8th edition of AJCC staging system: a multicenter cohort study. Sheng W; Dong M; Wang G; Shi X; Gao W; Wang K; Song H; Shi G; Tan X BMC Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(1):981. PubMed ID: 31640615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]