BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33855599)

  • 1. A proposal to modify the 8th edition of the UICC staging system for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
    Matsumoto T; Okabayashi T; Sui K; Kimura J; Morita S; Iwata J; Iiyama T; Kubota K; Shimada Y
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):667-677. PubMed ID: 33855599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. pT but not pN stage of the 8th TNM classification significantly improves prognostication in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
    Schlitter AM; Jesinghaus M; Jäger C; Konukiewitz B; Muckenhuber A; Demir IE; Bahra M; Denkert C; Friess H; Kloeppel G; Ceyhan GO; Weichert W
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():121-129. PubMed ID: 28802189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
    Shin DW; Lee JC; Kim J; Woo SM; Lee WJ; Han SS; Park SJ; Choi KS; Cha HS; Yoon YS; Han HS; Hong EK; Hwang JH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2159-2165. PubMed ID: 31202572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition, for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
    Kassardjian A; Stanzione N; Donahue TR; Wainberg ZA; Damato L; Wang HL
    Pancreas; 2019 Aug; 48(7):876-882. PubMed ID: 31268985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.
    Fang C; Wang W; Deng JY; Sun Z; Seeruttun SR; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Liang H; Zhou ZW
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Nov; 38(1):67. PubMed ID: 30454049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-institutional Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) Changes for T and N Staging in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
    Allen PJ; Kuk D; Castillo CF; Basturk O; Wolfgang CL; Cameron JL; Lillemoe KD; Ferrone CR; Morales-Oyarvide V; He J; Weiss MJ; Hruban RH; Gönen M; Klimstra DS; Mino-Kenudson M
    Ann Surg; 2017 Jan; 265(1):185-191. PubMed ID: 27163957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer.
    van Roessel S; Kasumova GG; Verheij J; Najarian RM; Maggino L; de Pastena M; Malleo G; Marchegiani G; Salvia R; Ng SC; de Geus SW; Lof S; Giovinazzo F; van Dam JL; Kent TS; Busch OR; van Eijck CH; Koerkamp BG; Abu Hilal M; Bassi C; Tseng JF; Besselink MG
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Dec; 153(12):e183617. PubMed ID: 30285076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Refined prognostic staging for resected pancreatic cancer by modified stage grouping and addition of tumour grade.
    König AK; Gros H; Hinz U; Hank T; Kaiser J; Hackert T; Bergmann F; Büchler MW; Strobel O
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 34344573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Comparative Analysis Between the 7th and 8th Versions of the AJCC/UICC Staging System Based on the SEER Database.
    Yang F; Zhong Q; Huang Z; Lian M; Fang J
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2019; 10():10. PubMed ID: 30733707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Equipping the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with tumor grade: a recursive partitioning analysis.
    Chen YT; Huang ZP; Zhou ZW; He MM
    Med Oncol; 2016 Nov; 33(11):122. PubMed ID: 27730526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma is Spread to the Peripancreatic Soft Tissue in the Majority of Resected Cases, Rendering the AJCC T-Stage Protocol (7th Edition) Inapplicable and Insignificant: A Size-Based Staging System (pT1: ≤2, pT2: >2-≤4, pT3: >4 cm) is More Valid and Clinically Relevant.
    Saka B; Balci S; Basturk O; Bagci P; Postlewait LM; Maithel S; Knight J; El-Rayes B; Kooby D; Sarmiento J; Muraki T; Oliva I; Bandyopadhyay S; Akkas G; Goodman M; Reid MD; Krasinskas A; Everett R; Adsay V
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):2010-8. PubMed ID: 26832882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multinational validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition pancreatic cancer staging system in a pancreas head cancer cohort.
    Kwon W; He J; Higuchi R; Son D; Lee SY; Kim J; Kim H; Kim SW; Wolfgang CL; Cameron JL; Yamamoto M; Jang JY
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2018 Sep; 25(9):418-427. PubMed ID: 30118171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gross tumor size using the AJCC 8th ed. T staging criteria does not provide prognostic stratification for neoadjuvant treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
    Rowan DJ; Hartley CP; Aldakkak M; Christians KK; Evans DB; Tsai S; Hagen CE
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Jun; 46():151485. PubMed ID: 32172219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of long-term prognosis for differentiated thyroid cancer according to the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system.
    Kim K; Kim JK; Lee CR; Kang SW; Lee J; Jeong JJ; Nam KH; Chung WY
    Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab; 2020; 11():2042018820921019. PubMed ID: 32489582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AJCC 7th edition staging classification is more applicable than AJCC 8th edition staging classification for invasive IPMN.
    Fan Z; Cheng H; Jin K; Gong Y; Huang Q; Xu J; Ni Q; Yu X; Liu C; Luo G
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Aug; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 31387646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The diversity between curatively resected pancreatic head and body-tail cancers based on the 8th edition of AJCC staging system: a multicenter cohort study.
    Sheng W; Dong M; Wang G; Shi X; Gao W; Wang K; Song H; Shi G; Tan X
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(1):981. PubMed ID: 31640615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the seventh and eighth editions of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: analysis of 1317 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy at two centers.
    Yang XL; Wang Y; Liang SB; He SS; Chen DM; Chen HY; Lu LX; Chen Y
    BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):606. PubMed ID: 29843648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The applicability of new TNM classification for humanpapilloma virus-related oropharyngeal cancer in the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system in Japan: A single-centre study.
    Sano D; Yabuki K; Arai Y; Tanabe T; Chiba Y; Nishimura G; Takahashi H; Yamanaka S; Oridate N
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):558-565. PubMed ID: 28760331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the 8th AJCC staging system for pathologically versus clinically staged pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A time to revisit a dogma?
    Abdel-Rahman O
    Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2018 Feb; 17(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 29428107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of the predictive value of the sixth and seventh edition TNM pT classifications in prognosis for gastric cancer].
    Zhang P; Xu Y; Guo J; Xu H
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 37(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 25975787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.