147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33855599)
21. Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new AJCC 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; a need to subclassify stage III?
Song M; Yoon SB; Lee IS; Hong TH; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Lee MA; Jung ES; Choi MG
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():62-69. PubMed ID: 30326370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Can extracapsular lymph node involvement be a tool to fine-tune pN1 for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction in the Union Internationale contre le Cancer (UICC) TNM 7th edition?†.
Nafteux P; Lerut T; De Hertogh G; Moons J; Coosemans W; Decker G; Van Veer H; De Leyn P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Jun; 45(6):1001-10. PubMed ID: 24477743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Proposal of a modified American Joint Committee on Cancer staging scheme for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a lymph node ratio-based N classification: A retrospective cohort study.
Li HJ; Chen YT; Yuan SQ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Aug; 97(34):e12094. PubMed ID: 30142869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognosis of the 8th TNM Staging System for Penile Cancer and Refinement of Prognostication by Incorporating High Risk Human Papillomavirus Status.
Wang B; Gu W; Wan F; Wei Y; Xiao W; Lu X; Zhang G; Zhou J; Wang Q; Ding X; Azizi M; Spiess PE; Ye D; Zhu Y
J Urol; 2020 Mar; 203(3):562-569. PubMed ID: 31596650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Proposed Modification of the 8th Edition of the AJCC Staging System for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Shi S; Hua J; Liang C; Meng Q; Liang D; Xu J; Ni Q; Yu X
Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):944-950. PubMed ID: 29334560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of the new TNM Staging System (8th edition) on oral tongue cancers.
Ammann Y; Beutner U; Vital DG; Morand G; Broglie Daeppen MA; Born D; Stoeckli SJ; Huber GF
Swiss Med Wkly; 2021 Apr; 151():w20493. PubMed ID: 33934314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mesenterico-portal vein invasion should be an important factor in TNM staging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Proposed modification of the 8
Chen HY; Wang X; Zhang H; Liu XB; Tan CL
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(46):6752-6766. PubMed ID: 31857777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis.
Kamarajah SK; Burns WR; Frankel TL; Cho CS; Nathan H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):2023-2030. PubMed ID: 28213792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of the 8th edition of AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Results from a non-endemic cohort with 10-year follow-up.
Wu LR; Zhang XM; Xie XD; Lu Y; Wu JF; He X
Oral Oncol; 2019 Nov; 98():141-146. PubMed ID: 31586896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging system in terms of predicting recurrence and survival in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Nam SH; Bae MR; Roh JL; Gong G; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Oral Oncol; 2018 Dec; 87():158-164. PubMed ID: 30527232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.
Sun Z; Wang ZN; Zhu Z; Xu YY; Xu Y; Huang BJ; Zhu GL; Xu HM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1918-27. PubMed ID: 22246426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Verification of the eighth edition of the UICC-TNM classification on surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma: Comparison with previous classification in a local center.
Minato H; Katayanagi K; Kurumaya H; Tanaka N; Fujimori H; Tsunezuka Y; Kobayashi T
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Jan; 5(1):e1422. PubMed ID: 34169671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the prognostic value of the 6th and 7th editions of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM staging system in patients with lower esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.
Mehta SP; Jose P; Mirza A; Pritchard SA; Hayden JD; Grabsch HI
Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 22591020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prognostic Discrepancy of the 6th and 7th UICC N Classification for Lymph Node Staging in Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Resection.
Oh SJ; Suh BJ; Park JK; Oh SD; Yu HJ
Case Rep Oncol; 2017; 10(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 28203165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Tumor size classification of the 8
Cong L; Liu Q; Zhang R; Cui M; Zhang X; Gao X; Guo J; Dai M; Zhang T; Liao Q; Zhao Y
Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):10383. PubMed ID: 29991730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Nationwide Validation of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System and Five Proposed Modifications for Resected Pancreatic Cancer.
Schouten TJ; Daamen LA; Dorland G; van Roessel SR; Groot VP; Besselink MG; Bonsing BA; Bosscha K; Brosens LAA; Busch OR; van Dam RM; Fariña Sarasqueta A; Festen S; Groot Koerkamp B; van der Harst E; de Hingh IHJT; Intven M; Kazemier G; de Meijer VE; Nieuwenhuijs VB; Raicu GM; Roos D; Schreinemakers JMJ; Stommel MWJ; van Velthuysen MF; Verdonk RC; Verheij J; Verkooijen HM; van Santvoort HC; Molenaar IQ;
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5988-5999. PubMed ID: 35469113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].
Shi GD; Luo ZL; Fu MY; Tian D; Zhang L; Zhang KP
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 36(12):916-21. PubMed ID: 25623766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the 8th edition of TNM staging of oral cancer with the 7th edition and its prognostic significance using clinical depth of invasion and extranodal extension.
Yokota Y; Hasegawa T; Yamakawa N; Rin S; Otsuru M; Yamada SI; Hirai E; Ashikaga Y; Yamamoto K; Ueda M; Kirita T; Umeda M; Akashi M; Kurita H; Ohiro Y; Yanamoto S; Okura M
Oral Oncol; 2023 Oct; 145():106519. PubMed ID: 37459802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of the 8th Edition of the UICC-TNM Classification on Clinical Stage 0-IA Lung Adenocarcinoma: Does the New Classification Predict Postoperative Prognosis More Precisely than the Previous One?
Wang L; Anraku M; Sato M; Nitadori JI; Nagayama K; Kitano K; Nakajima J
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 24(5):223-229. PubMed ID: 29848840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
