These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33855667)

  • 1. Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with 'targetless' search training.
    Muhl-Richardson A; Parker MG; Recio SA; Tortosa-Molina M; Daffron JL; Davis GJ
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Apr; 6(1):33. PubMed ID: 33855667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction to: Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with 'targetless' search training.
    Muhl-Richardson A; Parker MG; Recio SA; Tortosa-Molina M; Daffron JL; Davis GJ
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Sep; 6(1):60. PubMed ID: 34477977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced threat detection in three dimensions: An image-matched comparison of computed tomography and dual-view X-ray baggage screening.
    Parker MG; Muhl-Richardson A; Davis G
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Nov; 105():103834. PubMed ID: 35777185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits from negative templates in easy and difficult search depend on rapid distractor rejection and enhanced guidance.
    Zhang Z; Sahatdjian R; Carlisle NB
    Vision Res; 2022 Aug; 197():108031. PubMed ID: 35462088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of image enhancements in three-dimensional computed tomography baggage screening.
    Muhl-Richardson A; Parker MG; Davis G
    Appl Ergon; 2025 Jan; 122():104394. PubMed ID: 39326262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection measures for visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage.
    Sterchi Y; Hättenschwiler N; Schwaninger A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1297-1311. PubMed ID: 30684203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The depth of distractor processing in search with clutter.
    Bravo MJ; Farid H
    Perception; 2007; 36(6):821-9. PubMed ID: 17718361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Target templates specify visual, not semantic, features to guide search: A marked asymmetry between seeking and ignoring.
    Daffron JL; Davis G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2049-65. PubMed ID: 27055459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
    Won BY; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Change of search time and non-search time in X-ray baggage screening due to training.
    Koller SM; Drury CG; Schwaninger A
    Ergonomics; 2009 Jun; 52(6):644-56. PubMed ID: 19424926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Templates for rejection can specify semantic properties of nontargets in natural scenes.
    Daffron JL; Davis G
    J Vis; 2015; 15(15):16. PubMed ID: 26605845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items.
    Menneer T; Stroud MJ; Cave KR; Li X; Godwin HJ; Liversedge SP; Donnelly N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):404-18. PubMed ID: 23294283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
    Zhang YR; Onyper S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 31359376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probabilistic rejection templates in visual working memory.
    Chetverikov A; Campana G; Kristjánsson Á
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104075. PubMed ID: 31841813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search.
    Lawrence RK; Cochrane BA; Eidels A; Howard Z; Lui L; Pratt J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Oct; 8(1):63. PubMed ID: 37816913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
    J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(9):3390-401. PubMed ID: 24573295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Role of Color in Search Templates for Real-world Target Objects.
    Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 28(11):1714-1727. PubMed ID: 27315273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2379-2392. PubMed ID: 32166644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.
    Balani AB; Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1058-76. PubMed ID: 21156870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.