These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33856157)

  • 1. Effect of transfemoral prosthetic socket interface design on gait, balance, mobility, and preference: A randomized clinical trial.
    Kahle JT; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter MR; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Swanson AE; Highsmith MJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Aug; 45(4):304-312. PubMed ID: 33856157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the transfemoral prosthetic socket interface designs on skeletal motion and socket comfort: A randomized clinical trial.
    Kahle J; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter M; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Highsmith J; Highsmith MJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32308126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transfemoral interfaces with vacuum assisted suspension comparison of gait, balance, and subjective analysis: ischial containment versus brimless.
    Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
    Gait Posture; 2014 Jun; 40(2):315-20. PubMed ID: 24852508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation.
    Fatone S; Caldwell R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets Effect on Gait Biomechanics in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Fatone S; Stine R; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Gard SA; Oros M; Major MJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 103(8):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 35296398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets on Comfort, Function, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction With Device in Persons With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Fatone S; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Stine R; Kim KY; Gard S; Oros M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Nov; 102(11):2063-2073.e2. PubMed ID: 34214499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless.
    Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative analysis of interface pressures in transfemoral prosthetic sockets.
    Paternò L; Truppa L; Ibrahimi M; Rosini E; Gruppioni E; Ricotti L; Menciassi A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Apr; 48(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 37379468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. THE EFFECT OF TRANSFEMORAL INTERFACE DESIGN ON GAIT SPEED AND RISK OF FALLS.
    Kahle JT; Klenow TD; Sampson WJ; Highsmith MJ
    Technol Innov; 2016 Sep; 18(2-3):167-173. PubMed ID: 28066525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancement of a prosthetic knee with a microprocessor-controlled gait phase switch reduces falls and improves balance confidence and gait speed in community ambulators with unilateral transfemoral amputation.
    Fuenzalida Squella SA; Kannenberg A; Brandão Benetti Â
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Apr; 42(2):228-235. PubMed ID: 28691574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Hybrid Subischial Socket for Persons With Transfemoral Amputation: Gait Parameters and Clinical Assessment of a Case Series.
    Pellegrini R; Denza G; Brunelli S; Zenardi D; Imperio M; Vannozzi G; Traballesi M
    Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2021; 4(1):36252. PubMed ID: 37614930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Shape in a Developing Country: A study to compare initial outcomes in Pressure Cast hydrostatic and Patella Tendon Bearing designs.
    Laing S; Lythgo N; Lavranos J; Lee PVS
    Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():363-368. PubMed ID: 28869901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation.
    Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation-Part 1: Description of technique.
    Fatone S; Caldwell R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28094686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of conventional socket attachment and bone-anchored prosthesis for persons living with transfemoral amputation - mobility and quality of life.
    Welke B; Hurschler C; Schwarze M; Jakubowitz E; Aschoff HH; Örgel M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 May; 105():105954. PubMed ID: 37075546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a microprocessor knee (C-Leg) with appropriate foot transitioned individuals with dysvascular transfemoral amputations to higher performance levels: a longitudinal randomized clinical trial.
    Jayaraman C; Mummidisetty CK; Albert MV; Lipschutz R; Hoppe-Ludwig S; Mathur G; Jayaraman A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 34034753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of prosthetic mobility and balance in transfemoral amputees with bone-anchored prosthesis vs. socket prosthesis.
    Gailey RS; Kristal A; Al Muderis M; Lučarević J; Clemens S; Applegate EB; Isaacson BM; Pasquina PF; Symsack A; Gaunaurd IA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Apr; 47(2):130-136. PubMed ID: 36701197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of NU-FlexSIV Socket Performance for Military Service Members with Transfemoral Amputation.
    Brown SE; Russell Esposito E; Ikeda AJ; Wilken JM; Fatone S
    US Army Med Dep J; 2018; (2-18):38-47. PubMed ID: 30623397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of ischial ramal angle for transfemoral ischial containment sockets.
    Quigley M; Dillon MP; Fernandez RG; Erbas B; Briggs C
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30044195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of prosthetic mass distribution on the spatiotemporal characteristics and knee kinematics of transfemoral amputee locomotion.
    Hekmatfard M; Farahmand F; Ebrahimi I
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jan; 37(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 22832472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.