BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33856509)

  • 1. Assessing locoregional treatment response to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: comparison of hepatobiliary contrast agents to extracellular contrast agents.
    Aslam A; Kamath A; Spieler B; Maschiocchi M; Sabottke CF; Chernyak V; Lewis SC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Aug; 46(8):3565-3578. PubMed ID: 33856509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI.
    Bae JS; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Joo I; Lee KB; Kim H
    Radiology; 2021 May; 299(2):336-345. PubMed ID: 33650901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging for HCC diagnosis: prospective comparison with gadoxetic acid using LI-RADS.
    Cha DI; Choi GS; Kim YK; Kim JM; Kang TW; Song KD; Ahn SH
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3723-3734. PubMed ID: 32128620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporation of Ancillary MRI Features Into the LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Impact on Diagnostic Performance After Locoregional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kim YY; Kim MJ; Yoon JK; Shin J; Roh YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Mar; 218(3):484-493. PubMed ID: 34585608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features.
    Kim SW; Joo I; Kim HC; Ahn SJ; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Lee JM
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2861-2870. PubMed ID: 32006170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Gadoxetic Acid and Extracellular Contrast for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System.
    Min JH; Kim JM; Kim YK; Kang TW; Lee SJ; Choi GS; Choi SY; Ahn S
    Hepatology; 2018 Dec; 68(6):2254-2266. PubMed ID: 30070365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of extracellular and hepatobiliary MR contrast agents for the diagnosis of small HCCs.
    Paisant A; Vilgrain V; Riou J; Oberti F; Sutter O; Laurent V; Rodes A; Guiu B; Cassinotto C; Trillaud H; Bricault I; Michalak S; Bruno O; Ronot M; Aubé C
    J Hepatol; 2020 May; 72(5):937-945. PubMed ID: 31870951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Gadobenate-Enhanced MRI and Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Using LI-RADS Version 2018: A Prospective Intraindividual Randomized Study.
    Rong D; He B; Tang W; Xie S; Kuang S; Grazioli L; Hussain SM; Yang Y; Wang J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Apr; 218(4):687-698. PubMed ID: 34817191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Extracellular Contrast Detects Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Greater Accuracy Than With Gadoxetic Acid or Computed Tomography.
    Min JH; Kim JM; Kim YK; Cha DI; Kang TW; Kim H; Choi GS; Choi SY; Ahn S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 18(9):2091-2100.e7. PubMed ID: 31843599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A modified LI-RADS: targetoid tumors with enhancing capsule can be diagnosed as HCC instead of LR-M lesions.
    Min JH; Kim JM; Kim YK; Kim H; Choi GS; Kang TW; Cha D; Hwang JA; Ko SE; Ahn S
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):912-922. PubMed ID: 34345947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective comparison of EASL 2018 and LI-RADS 2018 for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lee S; Kim MJ; Kim SS; Shin H; Kim DY; Choi JY; Park MS; Mitchell DG
    Hepatol Int; 2020 Jan; 14(1):70-79. PubMed ID: 31802388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EASL versus LI-RADS: Intra-individual comparison of MRI with extracellular contrast and gadoxetic acid for diagnosis of small HCC.
    Min JH; Kim JM; Kim YK; Kim H; Cha DI; Kang TW; Choi GS; Choi SY; Ahn S
    Liver Int; 2021 Dec; 41(12):2986-2996. PubMed ID: 34242468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance of MRI for residual or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment according to contrast agent type: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.
    Zhou S; Wang S; Xiang J; Han Z; Wang W; Zhang S; Opara NC; Ju S; Cui Y; Wang YC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Feb; 49(2):471-483. PubMed ID: 38200213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lee S; Kim SS; Chang DR; Kim H; Kim MJ
    Clin Mol Hepatol; 2020 Jul; 26(3):340-351. PubMed ID: 32492765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2017 (LI-RADS) Criteria for Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kierans AS; Makkar J; Guniganti P; Cornman-Homonoff J; Lee MJ; Pittman M; Askin G; Hecht EM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e205-e215. PubMed ID: 30257054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arterial subtraction images of gadoxetate-enhanced MRI improve diagnosis of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Kim DH; Choi SH; Byun JH; Kang JH; Lim YS; Lee SJ; Kim SY; Won HJ; Shin YM; Kim PN
    J Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 71(3):534-542. PubMed ID: 31108157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. LI-RADS Version 2017 versus Version 2018: Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MRI.
    Lee SM; Lee JM; Ahn SJ; Kang HJ; Yang HK; Yoon JH
    Radiology; 2019 Sep; 292(3):655-663. PubMed ID: 31310175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.
    Seo N; Kim MS; Park MS; Choi JY; Do RKG; Han K; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):261-271. PubMed ID: 31418085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Usefulness of Arterial Subtraction in Applying Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm to Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.
    Youn SY; Kim DH; Choi JI; Choi MH; Kim B; Shin YR; Oh SN; Rha SE
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1289-1299. PubMed ID: 34047507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Updates on LI-RADS Treatment Response Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focusing on MRI.
    Patel R; Aslam A; Parikh ND; Mervak B; Mubarak E; Higgins L; Lala K; Conner JF; Khaykin V; Bashir M; Do RKG; Burke LMB; Smith EN; Kim CY; Shampain KL; Owen D; Mendiratta-Lala M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Jun; 57(6):1641-1654. PubMed ID: 36872608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.