These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33856823)

  • 21. Source reinstatement in item-method directed forgetting influences recognition strategies.
    Hourihan KL
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Sep; 76(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 35797160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory.
    Onyper SV; Zhang YX; Howard MW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):341-64. PubMed ID: 20438255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sensitivity of the hippocampus to objective but not subjective episodic memory judgments.
    Thakral PP; Yu SS; Rugg MD
    Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Jul; 13(3-4):165-170. PubMed ID: 35148666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pupil dilation during recognition reflects the subjective recollection/familiarity experience at test rather than the level of processing at encoding.
    Taikh A; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Sep; 76(3):186-192. PubMed ID: 35549359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.
    Smith CN; Wixted JT; Squire LR
    J Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 31(44):15693-702. PubMed ID: 22049412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On the validity of remember-know judgments: evidence from think aloud protocols.
    McCabe DP; Geraci L; Boman JK; Sensenig AE; Rhodes MG
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1625-33. PubMed ID: 21963257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Familiarity, but not recollection, supports the between-subject production effect in recognition memory.
    Fawcett JM; Ozubko JD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):99-115. PubMed ID: 27244352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Independent recollection-familiarity ratings: Similar effects of levels-of-processing whether amount or confidence is rated.
    Williams HL; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Jun; 73(2):94-99. PubMed ID: 30802078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Semantic memory recognition is supported by intrinsic recollection-like processes: "The butcher on the bus" revisited.
    Waidergoren S; Segalowicz J; Gilboa A
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3573-87. PubMed ID: 23026798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Two dichotomies of recognition memory.
    Hockley WE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Sep; 76(3):161-177. PubMed ID: 35816582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The distinctions of false and fuzzy memories.
    Schooler JW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1998 Nov; 71(2):130-43. PubMed ID: 9843618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.
    Cohen MS; Rissman J; Hovhannisyan M; Castel AD; Knowlton BJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1581-1601. PubMed ID: 28394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recollection, familiarity, and cortical reinstatement: a multivoxel pattern analysis.
    Johnson JD; McDuff SG; Rugg MD; Norman KA
    Neuron; 2009 Sep; 63(5):697-708. PubMed ID: 19755111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conceptual knowledge modulates memory recognition of common items: The selective role of item-typicality.
    Souza C; Garrido MV; Horchak OV; Carmo JC
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):77-94. PubMed ID: 34363197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Oct; 117(4):1025-54. PubMed ID: 20836613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of recollection and familiarity in visual working memory: A mixture of threshold and signal detection processes.
    Yonelinas AP
    Psychol Rev; 2024 Mar; 131(2):321-348. PubMed ID: 37326544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Age-related differences in the neural correlates mediating false recollection.
    Dennis NA; Bowman CR; Peterson KM
    Neurobiol Aging; 2014 Feb; 35(2):395-407. PubMed ID: 24094578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Recognition memory and prefrontal cortex: dissociating recollection and familiarity processes using rTMS.
    Turriziani P; Oliveri M; Salerno S; Costanzo F; Koch G; Caltagirone C; Carlesimo GA
    Behav Neurol; 2008; 19(1-2):23-7. PubMed ID: 18413912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection.
    Addante RJ; Ranganath C; Yonelinas AP
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 22548808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Independent recollection/familiarity ratings can dissociate: Evidence from the effects of test context on recognition of event details.
    Willems S; Schroyen S; Dehon H; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Jun; 73(2):100-104. PubMed ID: 30802076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.