BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3385697)

  • 1. Comparison of endometrial biopsy with the endometrial Pipelle and Vabra aspirator.
    Kaunitz AM; Masciello A; Ostrowski M; Rovira EZ
    J Reprod Med; 1988 May; 33(5):427-31. PubMed ID: 3385697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Vabra aspirator versus the Pipelle device for outpatient endometrial sampling.
    Naim NM; Mahdy ZA; Ahmad S; Razi ZR
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 47(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 17355303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vabra aspirator and pipelle endometrial suction curette. A comparison.
    Manganiello PD; Burrows LJ; Dain BJ; Gonzalez J
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Oct; 43(10):889-92. PubMed ID: 9800672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the Pipelle device and the Vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial denudation in hysterectomy specimens: the Pipelle device samples significantly less of the endometrial surface than the Vabra aspirator.
    Rodriguez GC; Yaqub N; King ME
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jan; 168(1 Pt 1):55-9. PubMed ID: 8420348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of the Pipelle endometrial suction curette for timed endometrial biopsies.
    Check JH; Chase JS; Nowroozi K; Wu CH; Chern R
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Mar; 34(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 2724236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Pipelle curette for endometrial biopsy.
    Henig I; Chan P; Tredway DR; Maw GM; Gullett AJ; Cheatwood M
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):786-9. PubMed ID: 2795561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
    Stovall TG; Photopulos GJ; Poston WM; Ling FW; Sandles LG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments.
    Silver MM; Miles P; Rosa C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):828-30. PubMed ID: 1923207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of late luteal phase endometrial biopsies using the Novak curette or PIPELLE endometrial suction curette.
    Hill GA; Herbert CM; Parker RA; Wentz AC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):443-5. PubMed ID: 2915869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endometrial biopsy using the Tao Brush method. A study of 50 women in a general gynecologic practice.
    Yang GC; Wan LS
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10710740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
    Bunyavejchevin S; Triratanachat S; Kankeow K; Limpaphayom KK
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of endometrial sampling with the Accurette and Vabra aspirator and uterine curettage.
    Goldberg GL; Tsalacopoulos G; Davey DA
    S Afr Med J; 1982 Jan; 61(4):114-6. PubMed ID: 7058425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage.
    Rauf R; Shaheen A; Sadia S; Waqar F; Zafar S; Sultana S; Waseem S
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 25603664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer.
    Guido RS; Kanbour-Shakir A; Rulin MC; Christopherson WA
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Aug; 40(8):553-5. PubMed ID: 7473450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vacuum curettage by the Vabrar method. A simple procedure for endometrial diagnosis.
    Einerth Y
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1982; 61(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 7148413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling.
    Kazandi M; Okmen F; Ergenoglu AM; Yeniel AO; Zeybek B; Zekioglu O; Ozdemir N
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Nov; 32(8):790-4. PubMed ID: 23075358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao Brush endometrial sampling.
    Williams AR; Brechin S; Porter AJ; Warner P; Critchley HO
    BJOG; 2008 Jul; 115(8):1028-36. PubMed ID: 18651884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomised trial comparing the H Pipelle with the standard Pipelle for endometrial sampling at 'no-touch' (vaginoscopic) hysteroscopy.
    Madari S; Al-Shabibi N; Papalampros P; Papadimitriou A; Magos A
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 19087077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endometrial brush biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
    Del Priore G; Williams R; Harbatkin CB; Wan LS; Mittal K; Yang GC
    J Reprod Med; 2001 May; 46(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 11396369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Dilatation and Curettage Versus Endometrial Biopsy by Pipelle--a Clinical Trial.
    Sanam M; Majid MM
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4971-5. PubMed ID: 26163624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.