These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33856995)

  • 21. Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Rendered Human Avatar Videos in Virtual Reality.
    Chen YC; Saha A; Chapiro A; Hane C; Bazin JC; Qiu B; Zanetti S; Katsavounidis I; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2024; 33():5740-5754. PubMed ID: 39356598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Blind Video Quality Prediction by Uncovering Human Video Perceptual Representation.
    Liao L; Xu K; Wu H; Chen C; Sun W; Yan Q; Jay Kuo CC; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2024; 33():4998-5013. PubMed ID: 39236121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Effects of User Engagements for User and Company Generated Videos on Music Sales: Empirical Evidence From YouTube.
    Park J; Park J; Park J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1880. PubMed ID: 30344501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using the Temporal Statistics of Global and Local Image Features.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Spatial-Temporal Video Quality Assessment Method via Comprehensive HVS Simulation.
    Zhang AX; Wang YG; Tang W; Li L; Kwong S
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2024 Aug; 54(8):4749-4762. PubMed ID: 38145521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Blind prediction of natural video quality.
    Saad MA; Bovik AC; Charrier C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):1352-65. PubMed ID: 24723532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ChipQA: No-Reference Video Quality Prediction via Space-Time Chips.
    Ebenezer JP; Shang Z; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():8059-8074. PubMed ID: 34534087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Video quality assessment using motion-compensated temporal filtering and manifold feature similarity.
    Song Y; Yu M; Jiang G; Shao F; Peng Z
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175798. PubMed ID: 28445489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multi-Dimensional Feature Fusion Network for No-Reference Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videos.
    Jiang J; Wang X; Li B; Tian M; Yao H
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video.
    Seshadrinathan K; Soundararajan R; Bovik AC; Cormack LK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Jun; 19(6):1427-41. PubMed ID: 20129861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Motion tuned spatio-temporal quality assessment of natural videos.
    Seshadrinathan K; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Feb; 19(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 19846374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Mobile Cloud Gaming Videos.
    Saha A; Chen YC; Davis C; Qiu B; Wang X; Gowda R; Katsavounidis I; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023; 32():3295-3310. PubMed ID: 37276105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CONVIQT: Contrastive Video Quality Estimator.
    Madhusudana PC; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023; 32():5138-5152. PubMed ID: 37676804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using Multi-Pooled, Saliency Weighted Deep Features and Decision Fusion.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. FOVQA: Blind Foveated Video Quality Assessment.
    Jin Y; Patney A; Webb R; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():4571-4584. PubMed ID: 35767478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating the role of content in subjective video quality assessment.
    Mirkovic M; Vrgovic P; Culibrk D; Stefanovic D; Anderla A
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():625219. PubMed ID: 24523643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Viewport-Based CNN: A Multi-Task Approach for Assessing 360° Video Quality.
    Xu M; Jiang L; Li C; Wang Z; Tao X
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2022 Apr; 44(4):2198-2215. PubMed ID: 33017289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inverse Visual Question Answering: A New Benchmark and VQA Diagnosis Tool.
    Liu F; Xiang T; Hospedales TM; Yang W; Sun C
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2020 Feb; 42(2):460-474. PubMed ID: 30418897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rich Visual Knowledge-Based Augmentation Network for Visual Question Answering.
    Zhang L; Liu S; Liu D; Zeng P; Li X; Song J; Gao L
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2021 Oct; 32(10):4362-4373. PubMed ID: 32941156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recurrent and Dynamic Models for Predicting Streaming Video Quality of Experience.
    Bampis CG; Li Z; Katsavounidis I; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Jul; 27(7):3316-3331. PubMed ID: 29641409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.