241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33859528)
1. Survival rates of patients who undergo minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer with cervical involvement.
Kim SI; Park DC; Lee SJ; Song MJ; Kim CJ; Lee HN; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(10):2204-2208. PubMed ID: 33859528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive surgery for patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer.
Kim SI; Park DC; Lee SJ; Yoo JG; Song MJ; Kim CJ; Lee HN; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1153-1158. PubMed ID: 33526975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of surgical approach on risk of recurrence after vaginal brachytherapy in early-stage high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer.
Philp L; Tannenbaum S; Haber H; Saini A; Laurent JS; James K; Feltmate CM; Russo AL; Growdon WB
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Feb; 160(2):389-395. PubMed ID: 33358198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.
Nasioudis D; Frey MK; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo TA; Holcomb K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 32276935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.
Segarra-Vidal B; Dinoi G; Zorrilla-Vaca A; Mariani A; Student V; Garcia NA; Llueca Abella A; Ramirez PT
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 138(6):828-837. PubMed ID: 34735382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oncologic outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer who received minimally invasive surgery: a retrospective observational study.
Tanaka T; Ueda S; Miyamoto S; Terada S; Konishi H; Kogata Y; Fujiwara S; Tanaka Y; Taniguchi K; Komura K; Ohmichi M
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Nov; 25(11):1985-1994. PubMed ID: 32648131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival in endometrial cancer in relation to minimally invasive surgery or open surgery - a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study.
Borgfeldt C; Holmberg E; Marcickiewicz J; Stålberg K; Tholander B; Lundqvist EÅ; Flöter-Rådestad A; Bjurberg M; Dahm-Kähler P; Hellman K; Hjerpe E; Kjölhede P; Rosenberg P; Högberg T
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):658. PubMed ID: 34078319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers.
Nieto VL; Huang Y; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):463.e1-463.e12. PubMed ID: 30086293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery.
Padilla-Iserte P; Lago V; Tauste C; Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Oliver R; Coronado P; Martín-Salamanca MB; Pantoja-Garrido M; Marcos-Sanmartin J; Gilabert-Estellés J; Lorenzo C; Cazorla E; Roldán-Rivas F; Rodríguez-Hernández JR; Sánchez L; Muruzábal JC; Hervas D; Domingo S;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):65.e1-65.e11. PubMed ID: 32693096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nationwide Introduction of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer and Its Association With Severe Complications.
Jørgensen SL; Mogensen O; Wu C; Lund K; Iachina M; Korsholm M; Jensen PT
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jun; 154(6):530-538. PubMed ID: 30810740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of minimally invasive versus open surgery in the treatment of endometrial carcinosarcoma.
Pedra Nobre S; Mueller JJ; Gardner GJ; Long Roche K; Brown CL; Soslow RA; Alektiar KM; Sonoda Y; Broach VA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1162-1168. PubMed ID: 32690592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disparities in Surgical Care Among Women With Endometrial Cancer.
Mannschreck D; Matsuno RK; Moriarty JP; Borah BJ; Dowdy SC; Tanner EJ; Makary MA; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Temkin SM; Fader AN
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 128(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 27500330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recurrence and Survival Rates of Patients Who Undergo Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometrial Carcinoma with Different Prognostic Risk Groups.
Liu B; Lin J; Liu W; Chen W; Lin W; Chen W
J Invest Surg; 2023 Dec; 36(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 36341742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of disease recurrence between robotic versus laparotomy approach in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
Song J; Le T; Hopkins L; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Lupe K; Gaudet M; E C; Samant R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Feb; 30(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 31871112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
