BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33859528)

  • 21. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
    Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study.
    Jensen PT; Schnack TH; Frøding LP; Bjørn SF; Lajer H; Markauskas A; Jochumsen KM; Fuglsang K; Dinesen J; Søgaard CH; Søgaard-Andersen E; Jensen MM; Knudsen A; Øster LH; Høgdall C
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 128():47-56. PubMed ID: 32109850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Oncologic safety of minimally invasive surgery in non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.
    Ahn JH; Park DC; Yoon JH; Lee SJ; Cha J; Yoo JG; Lee HN; Kim SI
    Asian J Surg; 2022 Jun; 45(6):1253-1258. PubMed ID: 34663530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer.
    Argenta PA; Mattson J; Rivard CL; Luther E; Schefter A; Vogel RI
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 May; 165(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 35314086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer.
    Koskas M; Jozwiak M; Fournier M; Vergote I; Trum H; Lok C; Amant F
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 65():185-91. PubMed ID: 27505629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimally Invasive Surgery Rate as a Quality Metric for Endometrial Cancer.
    Polan RM; Tanner EJ; Barber EL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1389-1394. PubMed ID: 31655129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Primary conization overcomes the risk of developing local recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
    Bogani G; Ditto A; Chiappa V; Pinelli C; Sonetto C; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Oct; 151(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 32511745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
    Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparison of progression-free and overall survival between endometrial cancer patients treated with laparoscopic and open surgical techniques].
    Póka R; Baradács I
    Orv Hetil; 2020 Mar; 161(10):382-388. PubMed ID: 32115990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Isolated port-site metastases after minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: outcomes of patients treated with radiotherapy.
    Grant JD; Garg AK; Gopal R; Soliman PT; Jhingran A; Eifel PJ; Klopp AH
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):869-74. PubMed ID: 25790043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally Invasive Staging Surgery in Women with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.
    Bregar AJ; Melamed A; Diver E; Clemmer JT; Uppal S; Schorge JO; Rice LW; Del Carmen MG; Rauh-Hain JA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):1677-1687. PubMed ID: 28074326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of survival outcomes between minimally invasive and open surgery in the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer: a population-based study in Osaka Japan.
    Sasano T; Mabuchi S; Komura N; Maeda M; Kamiura S; Morishima T; Miyashiro I
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2023 Aug; 53(9):791-797. PubMed ID: 37366149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prophylactic anticoagulation after minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Bell S; Orellana T; Garrett A; Smith K; Kim H; Rosiello A; Rush S; Berger J; Lesnock J
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Dec; 33(12):1875-1881. PubMed ID: 37903564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Changing treatment landscape for early cervical cancer: outcomes reported with minimally invasive surgery compared with an open approach.
    Melamed A; Ramirez PT
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 32(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 31815768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes with Laparotomy, and Laparoscopic or Robotic Surgery for Women with Endometrial Cancer.
    Manchana T; Puangsricharoen P; Sirisabya N; Worasethsin P; Vasuratna A; Termrungruanglert W; Tresukosol D
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(13):5483-8. PubMed ID: 26225698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free Survival Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Janda M; Gebski V; Davies LC; Forder P; Brand A; Hogg R; Jobling TW; Land R; Manolitsas T; Nascimento M; Neesham D; Nicklin JL; Oehler MK; Otton G; Perrin L; Salfinger S; Hammond I; Leung Y; Sykes P; Ngan H; Garrett A; Laney M; Ng TY; Tam K; Chan K; Wrede CD; Pather S; Simcock B; Farrell R; Robertson G; Walker G; Armfield NR; Graves N; McCartney AJ; Obermair A
    JAMA; 2017 Mar; 317(12):1224-1233. PubMed ID: 28350928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
    Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.