241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33859528)
41. Surgical and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for stage I high-grade endometrial cancer.
Nasioudis D; Heyward QD; Haggerty AF; Giuntoli Ii RL; Burger RA; Morgan MA; Ko EM; Latif NA
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():7-12. PubMed ID: 32103792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Venous Thromboembolism in Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
Barber EL; Gehrig PA; Clarke-Pearson DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 128(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 27275805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Survival and recurrence in stage II endometrial cancers in relation to uterine risk stratification after introduction of lymph node resection and omission of postoperative radiotherapy: a Danish Gynecological Cancer Group Study.
Ørtoft G; Høgdall C; Hansen ES; Dueholm M
J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 31(2):e22. PubMed ID: 31912677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Minimally invasive approach in endometrial cancer with lower uterine segment involvement in stage ≥ II: A retrospective study.
Perri T; Levin G; Helpman L; Eitan R; Vaknin Z; Lavie O; Ben Arie A; Amit A; Levy T; Namazov A; Ben Shachar I; Atlas I; Bruchim I; Kogan L; Gemer O
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Jan; 268():43-47. PubMed ID: 34800816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Impact of surgical approach on prevalence of positive peritoneal cytology and lymph-vascular invasion in patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a National Cancer Database study.
Nasioudis D; Ko EM; Cory L; Latif N
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Jul; 31(7):1001-1006. PubMed ID: 33853880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Survival of microsatellite-stable endometrioid endometrial cancer patients after minimally invasive surgery: An analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas data.
Dai Y; Wang Z; Wang J
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 158(1):92-98. PubMed ID: 32376044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Robot-assisted surgery for women with endometrial cancer: Surgical and oncologic outcomes within a Belgium gynaecological oncology group cohort.
Kakkos A; Ver Eecke C; Ongaro S; Traen K; Peeters F; Van Trappen P; Laenen A; Despierre E; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Vergote I; Goffin F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 47(5):1117-1123. PubMed ID: 33268212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Minimally invasive surgery does not impair overall survival in stage IIIC endometrial cancer patients.
Papadia A; Garbade A; Gasparri ML; Wang J; Radan AP; Mueller MD
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Feb; 301(2):585-590. PubMed ID: 31781888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Survival after a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery in women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a population-based prospective cohort study.
Jørgensen SL; Mogensen O; Wu CS; Korsholm M; Lund K; Jensen PT
Eur J Cancer; 2019 Mar; 109():1-11. PubMed ID: 30654224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Retrospective comparative study of robot-assisted surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and laparotomy for endometrial cancer in patients with a low risk of recurrence.
Hayashi S; Yamanaka Z; Kojima J; Ono M; Sasaki T; Yamamoto A; Ono M; Futagami M; Nishi H
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Jan; 50(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 37848280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Is Surgical Staging Necessary for Patients with Low-risk Endometrial Cancer? A Retrospective Clinical Analysis.
Kokcu A; Kurtoglu E; Celik H; Kefeli M; Tosun M; Onal M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(13):5331-5. PubMed ID: 26225674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Surgery for the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer with a High Risk of Recurrence: A Propensity Score Matching Study in Korea and Taiwan.
Chang CS; Lai YL; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Kim BG; Cheng WF; Chen YL; Lee YY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 30(11):6855-6864. PubMed ID: 37386310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.
Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Impact of Obesity on Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer: A Multicenter Study Comparing Laparoscopy vs Open Surgery, with Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Uccella S; Bonzini M; Palomba S; Fanfani F; Ceccaroni M; Seracchioli R; Vizza E; Ferrero A; Roviglione G; Casadio P; Corrado G; Scambia G; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26282516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
