These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33860661)
1. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of long-term survival and urogenital functional outcomes. Li X; Liu ZH; Wang N; Ding J; Fan F; Cen XY; Wu M; Mi R; Liu H; Zhang YL Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino); 2023 Sep; 69(3):403-411. PubMed ID: 33860661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: a case-matched comparison. Park SY; Choi GS; Park JS; Kim HJ; Ryuk JP; Yun SH World J Surg; 2014 Jul; 38(7):1834-42. PubMed ID: 24366278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic surgery contributes to the preservation of bowel and urinary function after total mesorectal excision: comparisons with transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery. Miura T; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Suto A; Kubota S; Ichisawa A; Kuwata D; Yamada T; Tamba H; Matsumoto S; Hakamada K BMC Surg; 2022 Apr; 22(1):147. PubMed ID: 35449005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Xiong B; Ma L; Zhang C; Cheng Y J Surg Res; 2014 May; 188(2):404-14. PubMed ID: 24565506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of effect of robotic versus laparoscopic surgical technology on genitourinary function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Liu Y; Liu M; Lei Y; Zhang H; Xie J; Zhu S; Jiang J; Li J; Yi B Int J Surg; 2022 Aug; 104():106800. PubMed ID: 35934282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancers: has a paradigm change occurred? A systematic review by updated meta-analysis. Gavriilidis P; Wheeler J; Spinelli A; de'Angelis N; Simopoulos C; Di Saverio S Colorectal Dis; 2020 Nov; 22(11):1506-1517. PubMed ID: 32333491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic TME in patients with rectal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Li X; Wang T; Yao L; Hu L; Jin P; Guo T; Yang K Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(29):e7585. PubMed ID: 28723798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Male urogenital function after robot-assisted and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study. Tang B; Gao G; Ye S; Liu D; Jiang Q; Ai J; Lei X; Shi J; Li T BMC Surg; 2022 May; 22(1):185. PubMed ID: 35568823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term oncological outcomes in robotic versus laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Qiu H; Yu D; Ye S; Shan R; Ai J; Shi J Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():225-230. PubMed ID: 32251720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer results in a significantly higher quality of TME specimen compared to the laparoscopic approach-report of a single-center experience. Aselmann H; Kersebaum JN; Bernsmeier A; Beckmann JH; Möller T; Egberts JH; Schafmayer C; Röcken C; Becker T Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1575-1581. PubMed ID: 29971488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer. de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Medium-Term Oncological Outcomes. Li JJ; Zhang ZB; Xu SY; Zhang CR; Yang XF; Duan YX Surg Innov; 2023 Feb; 30(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 35507460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies. Xiong B; Ma L; Huang W; Zhao Q; Cheng Y; Liu J J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 Mar; 19(3):516-26. PubMed ID: 25394387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total mesorectal excision: open, laparoscopic or robotic. Young M; Pigazzi A Recent Results Cancer Res; 2014; 203():47-55. PubMed ID: 25102999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Efficiency analysis on functional protection of nerve plane-oriented laparoscopic total mesorectal excision]. Deng WH; Zheng YB; Tong SL; Cao FY; He XB; Xiao K; Song D; Yang YJ Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1144-1151. PubMed ID: 31874530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Kim JY; Kim NK; Lee KY; Hur H; Min BS; Kim JH Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):2485-93. PubMed ID: 22434245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Lim DR; Bae SU; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK Surg Endosc; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1728-1737. PubMed ID: 27631313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the short-term efficacy of two types of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lei Y; Jiang J; Zhu S; Yi B; Li J Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Jan; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 34846614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. D'Annibale A; Pernazza G; Monsellato I; Pende V; Lucandri G; Mazzocchi P; Alfano G Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):1887-95. PubMed ID: 23292566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Baek JH; Pastor C; Pigazzi A Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):521-5. PubMed ID: 20607559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]