These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33860661)

  • 41. Urogenital function following robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: meta-analysis.
    Fleming CA; Cullinane C; Lynch N; Killeen S; Coffey JC; Peirce CB
    Br J Surg; 2021 Mar; 108(2):128-137. PubMed ID: 33711141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a retrospective study of 672 patients.
    Shadmanov N; Aliyev V; Piozzi GN; Bakır B; Goksel S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):144. PubMed ID: 38554211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes.
    Asoglu O; Tokmak H; Bakir B; Aliyev V; Saglam S; Iscan Y; Bademler S; Meric S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 31313071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Operative and oncological outcomes after robotic rectal resection compared with laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Rahme J; Waters PS; Warrier SK; Heriot A
    ANZ J Surg; 2023 Mar; 93(3):510-521. PubMed ID: 36214098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sphincter-Saving Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision Provides Better Mesorectal Specimen and Good Oncological Local Control Compared with Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in Male Patients with Mid-Low Rectal Cancer.
    Aliyev V; Goksel S; Bakir B; Guven K; Asoglu O
    Surg Technol Int; 2021 May; 38():160-166. PubMed ID: 33537982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of the short-term operative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes between two types of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Da Vinci versus Micro Hand S surgical robot.
    Jiang J; Zhu S; Yi B; Li J
    Int J Med Robot; 2021 Aug; 17(4):e2260. PubMed ID: 33837608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Broholm M; Pommergaard HC; Gögenür I
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 May; 17(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 25515638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Long-term clinical outcomes of total mesorectal excision and selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced low rectal cancer: a comparative study of a robotic versus laparoscopic approach.
    Song SH; Choi GS; Kim HJ; Park JS; Park SY; Lee SM; Choi JA; Seok HA
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Apr; 25(4):413-423. PubMed ID: 33594627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Luca F; Valvo M; Ghezzi TL; Zuccaro M; Cenciarelli S; Trovato C; Sonzogni A; Biffi R
    Ann Surg; 2013 Apr; 257(4):672-8. PubMed ID: 23001075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Short- and long-term outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid-to-low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang X; Gao Y; Dai X; Zhang H; Shang Z; Cai X; Shen T; Cheng X; Yu K; Li Y
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):972-985. PubMed ID: 30374790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Initial experience of Chinese surgical robot "Micro Hand S″-assisted versus open and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes in a single center.
    Wang Y; Li Z; Yi B; Zhu S
    Asian J Surg; 2022 Jan; 45(1):299-306. PubMed ID: 34147330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.
    Trastulli S; Farinella E; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Avenia N; Sciannameo F; Gullà N; Noya G; Boselli C
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):e134-56. PubMed ID: 22151033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes.
    Bianchi PP; Ceriani C; Locatelli A; Spinoglio G; Zampino MG; Sonzogni A; Crosta C; Andreoni B
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Nov; 24(11):2888-94. PubMed ID: 20526623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quality of life and functional outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer-results from the implementation period in Denmark.
    Bjoern MX; Clausen FB; Seiersen M; Bulut O; Bech-Knudsen F; Jansen JE; Gögenur I; Klein MF
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Sep; 37(9):1997-2011. PubMed ID: 35960389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).
    2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) collaborating group
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Sep; 20 Suppl 6():33-46. PubMed ID: 30255642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.
    Aliyev V; Tokmak H; Goksel S; Meric S; Acar S; Kaya H; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):655-661. PubMed ID: 31811567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kowalewski KF; Seifert L; Ali S; Schmidt MW; Seide S; Haney C; Tapking C; Shamiyeh A; Kulu Y; Hackert T; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 32025924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.
    Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
    Br J Surg; 2021 Nov; 108(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 34370834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.