176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33861775)
1. Predicting eyes at risk for rapid glaucoma progression based on an initial visual field test using machine learning.
Shuldiner SR; Boland MV; Ramulu PY; De Moraes CG; Elze T; Myers J; Pasquale L; Wellik S; Yohannan J
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249856. PubMed ID: 33861775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing Glaucoma Progression Using Machine Learning Trained on Longitudinal Visual Field and Clinical Data.
Dixit A; Yohannan J; Boland MV
Ophthalmology; 2021 Jul; 128(7):1016-1026. PubMed ID: 33359887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forecasting Risk of Future Rapid Glaucoma Worsening Using Early Visual Field, OCT, and Clinical Data.
Herbert P; Hou K; Bradley C; Hager G; Boland MV; Ramulu P; Unberath M; Yohannan J
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):466-473. PubMed ID: 36944385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma.
Wang M; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Boland MV; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Wang H; Baniasadi N; Li D; Silva RNE; Bex PJ; Elze T
Ophthalmology; 2018 Mar; 125(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 29103791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting Visual Field Worsening with Longitudinal OCT Data Using a Gated Transformer Network.
Hou K; Bradley C; Herbert P; Johnson C; Wall M; Ramulu PY; Unberath M; Yohannan J
Ophthalmology; 2023 Aug; 130(8):854-862. PubMed ID: 37003520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine-Identified Patterns of Visual Field Loss and an Association with Rapid Progression in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.
Yousefi S; Pasquale LR; Boland MV; Johnson CA
Ophthalmology; 2022 Dec; 129(12):1402-1411. PubMed ID: 35817199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining optical coherence tomography with visual field data to rapidly detect disease progression in glaucoma: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Garway-Heath DF; Zhu H; Cheng Q; Morgan K; Frost C; Crabb DP; Ho TA; Agiomyrgiannakis Y
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jan; 22(4):1-106. PubMed ID: 29384083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Opportunities for Improving Glaucoma Clinical Trials via Deep Learning-Based Identification of Patients with Low Visual Field Variability.
Wang R; Bradley C; Herbert P; Hou K; Hager GD; Breininger K; Unberath M; Ramulu P; Yohannan J
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2024; 7(3):222-231. PubMed ID: 38296108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster on Visual Field Performance.
Pham AT; Ramulu PY; Boland MV; Yohannan J
Ophthalmology; 2021 Oct; 128(10):1417-1425. PubMed ID: 33798655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A deep learning model incorporating spatial and temporal information successfully detects visual field worsening using a consensus based approach.
Sabharwal J; Hou K; Herbert P; Bradley C; Johnson CA; Wall M; Ramulu PY; Unberath M; Yohannan J
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1041. PubMed ID: 36658309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep learning model to predict visual field in central 10° from optical coherence tomography measurement in glaucoma.
Hashimoto Y; Asaoka R; Kiwaki T; Sugiura H; Asano S; Murata H; Fujino Y; Matsuura M; Miki A; Mori K; Ikeda Y; Kanamoto T; Yamagami J; Inoue K; Tanito M; Yamanishi K
Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 105(4):507-513. PubMed ID: 32593978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting rates of visual field progression in glaucoma patients with optic disc hemorrhage.
Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Teng CC; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19896197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new approach to measure visual field progression in glaucoma patients using variational bayes linear regression.
Murata H; Araie M; Asaoka R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):8386-92. PubMed ID: 25414192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing glaucoma progression on 24-2 and 10-2 visual field examinations.
Rao HL; Begum VU; Khadka D; Mandal AK; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127233. PubMed ID: 25978316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting Global Test-Retest Variability of Visual Fields in Glaucoma.
Choi EY; Li D; Fan Y; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Boland MV; Ramulu P; Yousefi S; De Moraes CG; Wellik SR; Myers JS; Bex PJ; Elze T; Wang M
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2021; 4(4):390-399. PubMed ID: 33310194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep Learning Approaches Predict Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage from OCT Optic Nerve Head En Face Images and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.
Christopher M; Bowd C; Belghith A; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Fazio MA; Girkin CA; Liebmann JM; Zangwill LM
Ophthalmology; 2020 Mar; 127(3):346-356. PubMed ID: 31718841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How Many Visual Fields Are Required to Precisely Predict Future Test Results in Glaucoma Patients When Using Different Trend Analyses?
Taketani Y; Murata H; Fujino Y; Mayama C; Asaoka R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 56(6):4076-82. PubMed ID: 26114484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors Predicting a Greater Likelihood of Poor Visual Field Reliability in Glaucoma Patients and Suspects.
Aboobakar IF; Wang J; Chauhan BC; Boland MV; Friedman DS; Ramulu PY; Yohannan J
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 32509439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability.
Yohannan J; Wang J; Brown J; Chauhan BC; Boland MV; Friedman DS; Ramulu PY
Ophthalmology; 2017 Nov; 124(11):1612-1620. PubMed ID: 28676280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual Field Progression in Patients with Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Using Pointwise Linear Regression Analysis.
Verma S; Nongpiur ME; Atalay E; Wei X; Husain R; Goh D; Perera SA; Aung T
Ophthalmology; 2017 Jul; 124(7):1065-1071. PubMed ID: 28372858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
