BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33861789)

  • 1. The processing of intimately familiar and unfamiliar voices: Specific neural responses of speaker recognition and identification.
    Plante-Hébert J; Boucher VJ; Jemel B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250214. PubMed ID: 33861789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological correlates of voice learning and recognition.
    Zäske R; Volberg G; Kovács G; Schweinberger SR
    J Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 34(33):10821-31. PubMed ID: 25122885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brain mechanism of unfamiliar and familiar voice processing: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.
    Sun Y; Ming L; Sun J; Guo F; Li Q; Hu X
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14976. PubMed ID: 36935917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The temporal lobes differentiate between the voices of famous and unknown people: an event-related fMRI study on speaker recognition.
    Bethmann A; Scheich H; Brechmann A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47626. PubMed ID: 23112826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.
    Zäske R; Awwad Shiekh Hasan B; Belin P
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():100-112. PubMed ID: 28738288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Familiarity and task context shape the use of acoustic information in voice identity perception.
    Lavan N; Kreitewolf J; Obleser J; McGettigan C
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104780. PubMed ID: 34298232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid pre-attentive processing of a famous speaker: Electrophysiological effects of Angela Merkel's voice.
    Rinke P; Schmidt T; Beier K; Kaul R; Scharinger M
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Aug; 173():108312. PubMed ID: 35781011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Familiar Voices Are More Intelligible, Even if They Are Not Recognized as Familiar.
    Holmes E; Domingo Y; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30096018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Voices to remember: Comparing neural signatures of intentional and non-intentional voice learning and recognition.
    Humble D; Schweinberger SR; Dobel C; Zäske R
    Brain Res; 2019 May; 1711():214-225. PubMed ID: 30685271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinct functional substrates along the right superior temporal sulcus for the processing of voices.
    Kriegstein KV; Giraud AL
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):948-55. PubMed ID: 15193626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Long Does It Take for a Voice to Become Familiar? Speech Intelligibility and Voice Recognition Are Differentially Sensitive to Voice Training.
    Holmes E; To G; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jun; 32(6):903-915. PubMed ID: 33979256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human brain potential correlates of voice priming and voice recognition.
    Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(9):921-36. PubMed ID: 11516445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How many voices did you hear? Natural variability disrupts identity perception from unfamiliar voices.
    Lavan N; Burston LFK; Garrido L
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 110(3):576-593. PubMed ID: 30221374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits for Voice Learning Caused by Concurrent Faces Develop over Time.
    Zäske R; Mühl C; Schweinberger SR
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143151. PubMed ID: 26588847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emotionally expressed voices are retained in memory following a single exposure.
    Kim Y; Sidtis JJ; Van Lancker Sidtis D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223948. PubMed ID: 31622405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On how the brain decodes vocal cues about speaker confidence.
    Jiang X; Pell MD
    Cortex; 2015 May; 66():9-34. PubMed ID: 25796072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative findings of voice and speech: language processing at an early ontogenetic age in quantitative EEG mapping.
    Radicevic Z; Vujovic M; Jelicic L; Sovilj M
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 184(4):529-32. PubMed ID: 17934726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Familiarity and Voice Representation: From Acoustic-Based Representation to Voice Averages.
    Fontaine M; Love SA; Latinus M
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1180. PubMed ID: 28769836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Person identification through faces and voices: an ERP study.
    González IQ; León MA; Belin P; Martínez-Quintana Y; García LG; Castillo MS
    Brain Res; 2011 Aug; 1407():13-26. PubMed ID: 21420393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Highly accurate and robust identity perception from personally familiar voices.
    Kanber E; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Apr; 151(4):897-911. PubMed ID: 34672658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.