These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33861884)

  • 1. Prediction of genomic breeding values of milk traits in Brazilian Saanen goats.
    de Sousa DR; do Nascimento AV; Lôbo RNB
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Sep; 138(5):541-551. PubMed ID: 33861884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle.
    Neves HH; Carvalheiro R; O'Brien AM; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Schenkel FS; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Cole JB; da Silva MV; Queiroz SA; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):17. PubMed ID: 24575732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction ability for feed efficiency traits using different models and pseudo-phenotypes under several validation strategies in Nelore cattle.
    Brunes LC; Baldi F; Lopes FB; Narciso MG; Lobo RB; Espigolan R; Costa MFO; Magnabosco CU
    Animal; 2021 Feb; 15(2):100085. PubMed ID: 33573965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of genome-wide association and genomic prediction methods for milk production traits in Korean Holstein cattle.
    Lee S; Dang C; Choy Y; Do C; Cho K; Kim J; Kim Y; Lee J
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 32(7):913-921. PubMed ID: 30744323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values in Hereford beef cattle using national or international training populations.
    Saatchi M; Ward J; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1538-51. PubMed ID: 23345550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of genomic prediction using different models and response variables in the Nordic Red cattle population.
    Gao H; Lund MS; Zhang Y; Su G
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Oct; 130(5):333-40. PubMed ID: 24074170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model comparison on genomic predictions using high-density markers for different groups of bulls in the Nordic Holstein population.
    Gao H; Su G; Janss L; Zhang Y; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jul; 96(7):4678-87. PubMed ID: 23660137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits in Canadian Alpine and Saanen dairy goats.
    Massender E; Brito LF; Maignel L; Oliveira HR; Jafarikia M; Baes CF; Sullivan B; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Mar; 105(3):2393-2407. PubMed ID: 34998569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of genomic breeding values for reproductive traits in Nellore heifers.
    Costa RB; Irano N; Diaz IDPS; Takada L; Hermisdorff IDC; Carvalheiro R; Baldi F; de Oliveira HN; Tonhati H; de Albuquerque LG
    Theriogenology; 2019 Feb; 125():12-17. PubMed ID: 30368127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of genetic and genomic breeding values in Saanen and Alpine goats.
    Negro A; Cesarani A; Cortellari M; Bionda A; Fresi P; Macciotta NPP; Grande S; Biffani S; Crepaldi P
    Animal; 2024 Apr; 18(4):101118. PubMed ID: 38508133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single- and multiple-breed genomic evaluations for conformation traits in Canadian Alpine and Saanen dairy goats.
    Massender E; Brito LF; Maignel L; Oliveira HR; Jafarikia M; Baes CF; Sullivan B; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jul; 105(7):5985-6000. PubMed ID: 35534269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle.
    Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of single-step genomic BLUP random regression test-day models and SNP effects analysis on milk yield in French Saanen goats.
    Arnal M; Robert-Granié C; Ducrocq V; Larroque H
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Jul; 106(7):4813-4824. PubMed ID: 37164843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
    Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction.
    Chen L; Li C; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101544. PubMed ID: 25025158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.